this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

América Latina & Caribe

8196 readers
32 users here now

[GUARANÍ] Tereg̃uaheporãite / [ES] Bienvenidos / [PT] Bem vindo / [FR] Bienvenue / [NL] Welkom

Everything to do with the USA's own Imperial Backyard. From hispanics to the originary peoples of the americas to the diasporas, South America to Central America, to the Caribbean to North America (yes, we're also there).

Post memes, art, articles, questions, anything you'd like as long as it's about Latin America. Try to tag your posts with the language used, check the tags used above for reference (and don't forget to put some lime and salt to it).

Here's a handy resource to understand some of the many, many colloquialisms we like to use across the region.

"But what about that latin american kid I've met in college who said that all the left has ever done in latin america has been bad?"

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/5045

Two reports claim that the Trump administration is poised to launch strikes against military targets inside Venezuela.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday night that the administration is preparing to attack a variety of targets inside Venezuela, including "ports and airports controlled by the military that are allegedly used to traffic drugs, including naval facilities and airstrips."

Reports from the US government and the United Nations have not identified Venezuela as a significant source of drugs that enter the United States, and the country plays virtually no role in the trafficking of fentanyl, the primary cause of drug overdoses in the US.

While the WSJ report said that the administration had not yet decided to carry out the operations against Venezuela, the Miami Herald reported on Friday morning that the administration "has made the decision to attack military installations inside Venezuela and the strikes could come at any moment."

A source who spoke with the Miami Herald didn't explicitly say that Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro would be the target of these actions, but they nonetheless hinted that the goal was to weaken his grip on power.

"Maduro is about to find himself trapped and might soon discover that he cannot flee the country even if he decided to,” the source said. “What’s worse for him, there is now more than one general willing to capture and hand him over, fully aware that one thing is to talk about death, and another to see it coming."

While the Trump administration has accused Maduro of leading an international drug trafficking organization called the Cartel de los Soles, some experts have expressed extreme skepticism of this claim.

Phil Gunson, analyst at the International Crisis Group think tank, said in an interview with Agence Presse-France earlier this year that he doubts that so-called "Cartel de los Soles" even exists, and noted that "direct, incontrovertible evidence has never been presented" to show otherwise.

Earlier this year, the administration attempted to tie Maduro to another gang, Tren de Aragua, despite US intelligence agencies rejecting the notion that the street gang had government connections.

Launching strikes on Venezuelan soil would mark a major escalation in the administration's military campaign targeting purported drug traffickers, which so far has consisted of drone strikes against boats in international waters that many legal experts have described as a campaign of extrajudicial murder.

Dozens of political leaders throughout Latin America earlier this month condemned the administration's attacks on the purported drug boats, and they warned that they could just be the start of a regime change war reminiscent of the coups carried out by the US government in the last century that installed military dictatorships throughout the region.

"We have lived this nightmare before,” they emphasized in a joint letter. “US military interventions of the 20th century brought dictatorships, disappearances, and decades of trauma to our nations. We know the terrible cost of allowing foreign powers to wage war on our continent. We cannot—we will not—allow history to repeat itself.”

Medea Benjamin, cofounder of anti-war group CodePink, accused the Trump administration of using a fight against alleged drug trafficking as a false pretext to seize Venezuela's vast oil reserves.

"Trump’s military buildup in the Caribbean isn’t about 'drugs,' it’s about oil, power, and regime change," she wrote in a post on X. "Venezuela has the largest proven oil reserves in the world, that’s why they’re escalating toward war."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 80 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

That's uh. That's called war. It's not "escalating towards war" if you're bombing military targets inside another country you're literally at war with that country

[–] miz@hexbear.net 41 points 3 weeks ago

I will refer you to the chart:

us-foreign-policy

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 32 points 3 weeks ago

Well if Israel bombing and killing 100 people is a ceasefire, then this actually isn't war tbh

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Excuse me, America and Israel have invented the new, completely sane concept of de-escalatory military strikes.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think it's that new. I remember hearing the pejorative term "Cruise Missile Displomacy" back during the Clinton administration. But yeah, the players are the same.

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Preemptively as a last resort

[–] onwardknave@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Trust me bruh, it's drug lords running those military bases.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Repeating the Iraq War, right down to the lies that were provably false at the time they were claimed, for a country's oil reserves

I hate this place

[–] KelvinSpace@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

Even the whole lead up is similar with years of sanctions intended to weaken the country. Just now there is barely any pretext for the intervention. You would think they would want another 9/11 to blame on Venezuela but nope they realized it doesn't matter.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] OrionsMask@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

Nuke the USA

xi-plz

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I have been seeing it said here and elsewhere that libs are falling for lies about Venezuela, but I haven't seen a single lib poster, lib I know IRL, or celebrity say anything but it's a bunch of bullshit.

Obviously dem politicians and industry execs etc are going to push for it quietly, but I haven't seen anyone really support it aside from the true chuds. Whether or not there is consent for government actions doesn't seem to have a ton of relevance in the US though.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Takei with a good take is a rare sight

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago

If it was Biden doing it he would be braying for blood so don't get too excited

[–] OrionsMask@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Give it time, a few weeks into it and every lib will be reciting the same lines about how it's necessary and how Venezuela is evil or whatever other shit the media tells them.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

I have been seeing it said here and elsewhere that libs

the conservative liberals are falling for it, maybe not the blue maga liberal liberals

[–] miz@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago

I hate this timeline.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago

Dear rest of world: please treat the government officials of my country like the rogue pariahs they are. These people are duplicitous and have never once convinced me they actually value human lives. Kthxbye

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have been saying this to myself for a couple hours now.

this from the president who has wondered aloud to the press about whether he's going to hell soviet-hmm

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 17 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The "president of peace", y'all. Attacking yet another foreign country for oil. (And to distract from the Epstein files and Trump's horrible, tariff-driven economy, and maybe to take control of the country before the midterms...)

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

how i can tell you're a liberal: you think this is a trump thing from a country that has literally almost never not been at war for its entire history

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's hilarious how often everything is just a 'distraction' from something and not because these people enjoy it and are essentially contractually obligated to murder non-white people.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also like just a continuation of general U.S. foreign policy. It's not like the democrats were undoing sanctions on Venezuela, despite it being, what, 10 years ago now I read statements from a UN rapporteur that stated in no uncertain terms that "it's the sanctions killing people"

Huh who was president in 2015 and before that...

Like fuck trump but my god, this is america continuing its long history of fucking evil

[–] rufuscrispo@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

yup, it's gulf war with monroe doctrine characteristics

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And a distraction from the Epstein files, which would totally take down Trump, to boot. We're reaching Mueller report levels of coping.

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To me it almost seems like the Epstein files are the actual distraction, people will continually harp about that when nothing will happen about it even if a 'list' came out, taking up the narrative instead of discussing the atrocities currently being committed and what we can do about them. It reflects people's attachment to the bourgeois structures in place, they are still clinging to the idea that if the right evidence comes out, the fascists will be arrested and we can go back to brunch.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's absolutely a distraction, Trump and his minions know the "Epstein files" (if there even is a convenient cache of evidence that would implicate Trump, which I doubt) aren't going to do jack to him, so why not let liberals harp on about it while all this other shit goes on.

Besides, we've seen all this before so many times. "When Mueller proves there was collusion with Russia, it's all over!" "Trump just got impeached, the collusion with Ukraine means it's all over!" "Trump just got convicted 47 times, it's all over!" etc., etc. If you still believe there's this one magic thing that'll bring Trump down, you're a sucker fell-for-it-again-award

[–] miz@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

the walls are closing in!

ah! well. nevertheless,

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

I mean I think if everything known about Epstein and, in particular, whatever chain of blackmail he had going on, were to become public in an unredacted form it would be kind of a big deal

except immediately after I say that it's like, no, redMAGA and blueMAGA would just say their guys were deepfaked if there's a video of them doing heinous shit

[–] miz@hexbear.net 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Harris would have signed off on this too, the problem is imperialism driven by capitalism not which bourgeois party is operating the bloodsoaked machinery

take control of the country

lol who do you think has control right now?

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 36 points 3 weeks ago

He definitely has to distract from the Epstein files, because in the US rich and powerful sex criminals always get the punishment they deserve.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Republican and Democratic Party administrations have been demonizing Venezuela for decades; this is just the culmination of that history; it was always going to come to this.

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

where is the supposed multi polar world? Russia has sent some help ( and it's busy fighting the entirety of NATO alone), China will just issue a strongly worded condemnation afterwards...fuck this world

[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ofc this is an escalation but I think it won't happen. For the past 20 years the Venezuela strategy has been constant pressure upon the population and upon maduro in order to create conditions where Maduro takes counter action - that can then be vilified.

They've had Navy boats stationed just off Venezuela for about 20 years now

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's 100% happening they fucking gave guaida the nobel peace prize