"damn it's weird the way NYT publishes 99% bourgeois lies, it must be such a bad ratio because the good writers won't write for them and not due to the class nature of the paper" —dimwitted Ben apparently
El Chisme
Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.
Rules:
Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.
Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 4: No sectarianism.
Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
They're right though. 
considering readership of new york crimes, one has to wonder who lends credence to whom. being part of "new york crimes is so wordly" wordly part is not a virtue. (not that single article changed any minds ever, unless it was pre-paid for to pursue desired policies, and was used as citation mill)
Ben Burgis and Nomiki Konst were the Majority Report era that pushed me out the left hand door
why organize a strike? you're just punishing the class-conscious workers and their supporters, to the benefit of the non-class-conscious workers

I wonder if there's an ideology for people that think workers should organize and withhold their labor to force change.
I mean, is there a single person in the world subscribed to the NYT who will unsub because of these writers' boycott?
only if they get the wordle guy/gal. you boycott things cause they are evil, and to make their evilness known, has to start somewhere no?
You claim to not like nazis, and yet you won't work for Der Sturmer? Wow, hypocrite much?