this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
315 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26209 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than a month later, the local congressional office in Tucson is shuttered and the phones ring unanswered. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson has refused to swear in Grijalva, a Democrat, while the government is shut down, leaving the residents of her sprawling southern Arizona district without a vote in Congress — or help back home.

“Here I am paying taxes to the federal government,” Wilson said from her Tucson office this week, “and not only is it closed but I don’t have a representative either.”

Grijalva spent much of the week in Washington unable to access government email and federal systems. While most congressional offices are buzzing with activity, her suite on the Hill remains mostly quiet and many desks sit empty. She doesn’t have the resources or authority, she said, to staff a district office or assist constituents who try to contact her. Without security privileges, she’s barred from bringing so much as a hammer into the Capitol for hanging pictures. It would be considered a weapon, she said.

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 82 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Guess Arizonans won’t have to pay their Federal Income Tax for 2025 then. No taxation without representation, right?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean... what are basically any states paying Federal taxes for, at this point?

Nearly everything the Federal government throws that money at... well they've pretty much stopped.

Oh but we need it to fund disaster response like- oh, right, that's all been repurposed into building concentration camps for ICE.

Oh but we need it to maintain critical infrastru- oh, right, that's all been falling apart for decades, unless its for a data center/bitcoin farm.

Oh but what about funding for the poor and homeless and Section 8 and - ... oh would you look at that, basically all cut down to the bone as well.

Meanwhile, the top of the income brackets for social security income taxes is ~180k. Which basically denotes the threshold between probably living paycheck to paycheck, and almost certainly not.

The fundamental system of funding would work fine if you just added another 2 or 3 or 4 brackets above that, but no, this is apparently an unthinkable concept, and we are all told social security just will go bankrupt and there is nothing that can be done.

Fuck that. Stop paying for it federally, do it at the state level.

Trump is currently busy invading Venezuela, and ICE vs just a couple state's nation guard units ... that doesn't end well for ICE, they are horrendously poorly trained and there are not that many of them, maybe 30k max for actual 'field agents'.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's because she will vote to release the Epstein files. Also, the Trump-Epstein Ballroom is coming along nicely.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Release the Trumpstein Files!

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mikey Mouse the esteemed GOP Squeaker of the House showing his true anti-democracy fascistic colours

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

You mean Little Johnson?