this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
734 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26307 readers
3927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is facing legal action over the demolition of the White House’s East Wing, part of a $300 million plan to build a new ballroom on the executive grounds.

A Virginia couple, Charles and Judith Voorhees, filed an emergency motion in federal court on October 23 seeking to halt the project, alleging that it violates multiple federal preservation and planning laws.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 225 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Good. The demolition is disgusting, and apparently illegal. If legal efforts don't lan out, the couple can send their son, Jason, to scare the courts

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 91 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't it be amazing that he would lose and have to put it back out of his own pocket? I mean won't happen in this reality as we're all in hell but still would be nice to think about.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 63 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you're sending Jason anyways you might as well have him fix the Supreme Court.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like this is a pop culture reference I’m missing. Jason?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This guy. The couple filing the suit share the last name Voorhees.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah thank you. Didn’t find “Jason” in the article and I thought “Jason” was a meme I was not aware of like “Karen”.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, there is a Jason meme, too, but that's something completely different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cue SCOTUS saying, "It's the President's house! Of course he can renovate it!"

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He has demolitional immunity!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 214 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I still can't get over how cartoonishly evil trump is. Dude is literally destroying the white house and tweeting AI videos of himself shitting on the US flag, the Constitution, and the American people. He is literally destroying our culture and heritage and he hasn't even finished with his first year in his new admin. He isn't the antichrist. He's the devil made flesh.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 97 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I love how cartoonishly evil, dumb and uncharismatic he is, and americans were like: "let's see what he has to offer a second time."

History lesson in the future has to be absolute wild. People will imagine some well spoken George Clooney like person and then they see a video of Krang talking about grabbing pussy.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hopefully there will be some commentary on media consolidation and how successfully propagandized the american public is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly though I do only feel I learned how dumb and ridiculous and drug-fuelled and self-destroying the Nazis were after I left school. History class took them much more seriously than people did at the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

And about half of the US basically see him as their god.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 105 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

We should make this a class action suit. Every patriotic / matriotic US citizen should sign on. We all have cause, we all have been harmed. If any of us tried to destroy a historic building, or modify it in any way with out a plan, with out approval from a host of government entities we would have been stopped on the very first day. FTS!

"The defendants are listed as Trump, in his official capacity, and Jessica Brown, director of the National Park Service." Excellent, J. Brown is not protected by SCOTUS. Go after the little fish. Charge the company doing the work, the guy running the backhoe, and everyone involved in this active destruction of The People's House.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 62 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd be up to join the class action suit. As a Canadian it's our right to be the ones to demolish the Whitehouse.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

THIS IS CULTURAL APPROPRIATION.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 64 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Well, the East Wing is demolished now. Just goes to show you how effective all this hand wringing is. You have to stop him, forcibly.

Once the building is a pile of rubble, he can just point at the pile of rubble and say well now we got to rebuild it I guess, oh and by the way I'm the one who gets to pick how it's rebuilt. Ironic this is not a bad metaphor for the state of the country.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 29 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

No. If courts decide that the demolition was illegal, he has to put it back exactly the way it was. It's not a free pass to "rebuild it the way he wants".

[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tell ya what Chester, I’ll take great big ol’ deep breath and hold it until that happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'm the one who gets to pick how it's rebuilt

What if he's not, though? What if the courts ordered that the building must be rebuilt the way it was? I don't think that'll happen, but I wouldn't mind if it did.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He should be arrested for vandalism.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if this is the thing that gets him removed from office? Wishful thinking, I know

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A guy spray paints his favorite words under a bridge so he gets 10 years. Orange guy demolishes the most iconic building in the nation.... down to the ground... Jail? Nope, presidential!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A nice gesture from some patriotic people, I'm sure, but we all know that laws meant to hold powerful people accountable for their actions are now meaningless.

I expect that if this suit does not get outright dismissed, a Trump-appointed circuit judge or the SCOTUS will swoop in to save Trump yet again.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

You're right, but I think this falls into the "don't obey in advance" rule of resistance to autocracy.

I've long since lost the will to support this type of action, like yourself I suppose. Everything is fucked all the way down. You can't not-lose in a corrupt court system.

However, I think it's important that every authoritarian action is challenged, because if you don't challenge then you really are kind of obeying in advance.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There should be a class-action lawsuit against him personally on behalf of the entire population of the United States. Force him to pay out of his pocket to return the site to its previous glory, then pay punitive damages to every single citizen of the United States...all out of his own pocket.

And make him sign each individual check, like in The Jerk. He loves to sign his name, this would make him HATE it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Azki25@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

The founding fathers would be turning in their graves. This time line is fked man. He's going to rig the next election if he doesn't get rid of elections all together. One thing he doesn't realise is dictatorships like RUS and China have unarmed controlled citizens.

The USA has the most heavily armed population on the planet.

He's fucking with fire and he is absolutely going to be burnt.

Bro just bulldozed history for a ball room.... Insanity.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

I am still waiting for Americans to use their guns to rise up against tyranny instead of using them to shoot minorities

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

In an all out war, (which I doubt will happen) all these guns in the population don't matter against drones, aircrafts, tanks and trained snipers or other soldiers. If the military and all other agencies decides to support Trump, all these weapons will be useless. The pentagon surely has plans for a civil uprising in their own country.

I don't think the US has enough ordinary citizen that would actually risk their lives for democracy, to make a difference. Media and social media is controlled by the oligarchy, and even the progressives don't seem to want to cut themselves loose of twitter, Facebook/Whatsapp, google, bluesky, discord and so on. Where would they even organize?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And yet you’d think with the whole right to bear arms and use it against kings would have kicked in already tho.

They still just use the guns on children and minorities.

This has been the most anticlimactic flex I’ve ever seen.

We will not be forgetting this one should another gun toting citizen from the US boast their reasons of the constitution.

Prepare to have this thrown in all the faces for generations to come.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He didn’t even get permits to do the demo.

That didn’t stop him.

What the hell is a lawsuit going to do?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago

He don't need no stinking permits, he's a REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I feel like Trump is setting a record for the most sued president while in office. And probably outside of office too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump: Does horrible thing

Two weeks after it matters: People: Sue over horrible thing

One year later: Court: Trump shouldn't have done that horrible thing.

Result: Horrible thing is done. No consequences for having done said horrible thing. Lawyers get paid. Courts give themselves pat on back. Democracy manifest!

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

Has anyone else heard that tRump is planning to bury the Epstein Files in the foundation of the Epstein Ballroom?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 21 points 2 weeks ago

"Maybe in your dreams!" responded Trumps lawyer Frederick Kruger.

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I hope this demolition company is doing this work for fun. No chance of getting paid with the shutdown and all...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I am vastly more concerned over the actual people being affected by this admin than destroying some stupid building. Who cares this much about the white house? Are we serious? Are we really talking about banding together to save the white house rather than the people being kidnapped and assaulted on the streets every day?

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

Well, my mother is a Trumper and even she said the WH demo is "ridiculous and disgusting", so, maybe it's a crack to pry open with louder complaints to help open more eyes like hers.

[–] heydo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

People can be upset about multiple things. Just because I am upset about the White House being destroyed doesn't mean I am not also upset about the lives of Americans being destroyed.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 18 points 2 weeks ago

"We" are not but some people might react stronger to this. I don't like it either, but every little bit helps.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I get this take and am in the same boat. The thing though is that the people who disapprove with trump is about the same as the number that "strongly disapprove" of trump. We have no more loathing to give.

Righting the ship will require breaking through to the disconnected and mildly red.

And the WH destruction is a) not a traditionally partisan issue, b) strongly symbolic, and c) a powerful visual.

So is it the worst thing he's doing? Not by a mile. Will I be happy if it wakes people up? Vehemently.

Hey, they got Capone on tax fraud

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Well, it is Trump's #1 objective right now. Not reopening the government or funding SNAP. Those are poor people problems.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

On one hand, yes, many Americans' morals are backwards and ideally humans being killed, brutalized and disappeared by this administration and it's agents would get more attention than an old building.

But on the other hand, that's unfortunately not where we're at. But where we are at is many people who would otherwise support or at least feel apathetic to what this administration is doing are appalled by the destruction of a national icon and I'll welcome any step towards eroding the support this administration has from a significant group of Americans.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, we are. There are plenty of lawyers and resources to fight this admin on all fronts. Any attempt to put him in check is not a loss on another.

You can be more personally concerned about the people being thrown in gulags and blown up on fishing boats - rightfully so - but it doesn't stand to reason that this fight is not worthy of pursuit. Lawyers who specialize in zoning laws, permit violations, and historical building renovation processes surely shouldn't have their efforts dismissed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FE80@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Quick, get Merrick Garland on the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eve@evecodes.com 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Too bad nothing will happen just like all the other lawsuits and “illegal” activities he’s done

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The demolition and the general idea doesn't bother me as much as the fact that we all know it's gonna be filled with gold-colored tacky shit and other fugly crap.

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

Not to mention the fact there is really no reason for a ball room at the White House. They hold these events in more fitting venues.

This isn't a ball room though. This is a throne room for the great Hamberder King.

load more comments
view more: next ›