this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
443 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

43373 readers
785 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 140 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This is something the EU should really regulate, unfortunately they are busy regulating oat ~~milk~~ drink and veggie~~burgers~~.

[–] persona_non_gravitas@piefed.social 76 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I contacted the EU DMA team a while back. Part of the response:

We have taken note of your concerns and, while we cannot comment on ongoing dialogue with gatekeepers, these considerations will form part of our assessment of the justifications for the verification process provided by Google.

So at least some part of the bureaucracy are aware of it.

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s the copy pasta I got, too!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] med@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

The thing I don't understand about any of this, is why can't you comment on ongoing dialogues with the gatekeepers?

I understand the basic tenants of keeping the discussion closed until official statements can be prepared, to prevent the press and the public from going off half cocked. That makes sense for private matters.

This is not private. I can't understand what is the point of negotiating law for people if they can't even see the ongoing process?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 39 points 1 month ago
  1. The EU hasn't even been able to stop Apple from doing this shit.

  2. The EU is actively preventing their own people from leaving the Google ecosystem with the Play Integrity API in their own apps.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm confused why so many open source developers think that the EU is going to be the foster parents of FOSS communities

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

There's a real effort in some EU countries to fund FOSS projects to get out from under US dominated tech.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

It's because they did a thing with USB once

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure the EU was designed to serve the interests of carnists and other capitalists.

[–] amos@mander.xyz 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Considering Google and Apple both donate to Trump, we really need an alternative: Linux mobile OS. A linux OS that can be installed on a range of phones, from cheap to more expensiove. Just buy the phone and install the OS, as you do on PCs.

[–] myszka@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Good linux mobile OSs already exist, but phones' hardware is still proprietary and messed up, so it is very difficult to provide a good hardware support for those mobile OSs

[–] mulcahey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Yes, the bottleneck isn't software, it's hardware. We need phones with unlocked bootloaders

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (50 children)

When will F-Droid stop working on stock android?

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 40 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Try Graphene today. IT WORKS

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Samsung s22 and s25, checking in. Graphene won't be viable for the vast, overwhelming majority of Android users today or in the coming seasons.

I hope people figure out some kind of virtualization/docker-containerization solution to the coming Goo-lag.

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Samsung s22 and s25

I'm still holding some hope that maybe Samsung's flavor of the OS won't have the restriction of requiring Google keys. Specially considering that Samsung has its own "Galaxy Store" with app submissions controlled by them, not Google.

Though it's possible they might simply extend the signatures accepted to include also the ones signed by them ^^U ..still it would give them a competitive edge to remove the restriction so they might be incentivized to do it.

[–] source_of_truth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm hopeful that the hackers will win. I will never underestimate the power of motivated, scorned engineers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago

Ok, I’ll extend your deadline til Monday then. ;)

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Except for stuff you really need like online banking, tap payments and digital ids

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

All my banking apps and credit card apps have worked flawlessly on Graphene OS. You're correct that tap to pay doesn't work, which is a bummer. But that is just Google spyware as well, honestly.

I heard about this a while ago, but I remember the GrapheneOS team talking about suing Google if they didn't allow them to pass play integrity checks like they should be able to, but Google just doesn't let them. That's the only reason tap to pay doesn't work and some baking apps have issues, its Google purposefully limiting graphene OS so they have a competitive edge somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Plenty of bank apps work just fine. None of the ones I've tried had problems, except Santander, which works perfectly after changing a setting.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not here in Norway. You need BankID which is an app that well, requires a lot of stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Neo@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

Personally I don't need or want any of those things on my phone.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's nothing set in stone yet. Google just committed to doing it is all that's happened so far. But the response against it has been pretty heavy and we'll see how it goes. We have to speak up right now and organize our communities like this post is doing.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

LOL. There's dozens of us here.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I honestly didn't realize how the fdroid deployment worked, and now I'm gonna be way less skeptical of apps I see there.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago

I do not go to Google play until apps on f-droid prove inadequate for my usage.

[–] TheCynicalSaint@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Can one just remove GSF and bypass this? Or is it something going to be built into Android going forward? Genuinely curious.

load more comments
view more: next ›