this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
914 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

27829 readers
2117 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    (page 2) 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
    [–] pageflight@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    *accidentally uninstalls python base package trying to fix dependency conflicts in apt

    [–] nroth@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

    No, then you fix the code to work with your current system libraries and upstream the patch and version bump. This happens less on Arch, BTW ;-)

    make: error: libX11.so permission denied or not found make: failed, something something finishing remaining jobs.

    dear god what does it mean

    I get that your issue was probably more nuanced than that, but what's so confusing about inatalling missing build dependencies? If projects have a build guide sometimes they'll straight up give you an install command for your distribution. If not, it's up to you to find the package names corresponding to what you need to install since they can differ from distro to distro.

    [–] UnityDevice@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

    More like:
    No system package -> installing from user repos -> appimage -> flatpak -> creating your own package -> using a VM with a distro that has the package -> not installing package

    If after that you still don't have it, ~~it wasn't meant to be~~ it's probably just not very good software.

    Personally go: Flatpak (I like easily controlling an apps premissions) -> flatpak version is broken... Try system package -> distrobox -> compiling -> appimage -> not installing a package

    Distrobox/containerd is so nice since a lot of the niche tools I use require Debian or Ubuntu dependency versions, but I'd be lying if I said everything "just works"

    [–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Or you could use nixpkgs. You can search if the package exists online or via cli.

    [–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

    All these different package manager systems.

    I think we just need to consolidate and make a standard one

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] rozodru@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

    nix-shell is great too. sort of like a "demo" of something before actually committing to it or if you just want to use something one off without adding it to your config and rebuilding.

    As a dev it's fantastic for testing also. can just try something on a bunch of browsers without actually installing the browser. love it.

    [–] x4740N@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

    Different packages having conflicting dependency versions needed for installation

    Edit: distrobox may be a viable solution to this

    [–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (7 children)

    Bruh just use nix, flatpak or appimage πŸ—Ώ (we don't talk about snaps)

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

    I at times have to install completely undocumented software. I love ccmake as it lists all available options. I guess there are other ways, but that makes it so easy.

    Then it's just a couple of days figuring out all necessary libraries.

    [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

    There should be some kind of automated certification for git repos, where if the described install process does not complete on a default install of the most popular OS, the software gets a big red "does not work" label.

    [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 6 days ago

    Me on gentoo with my fucked up GCC and python versions. I must have spent so many hours compiling trying to get this shit to the right versions on a Chromebook with very little disk space.

    Its cooked, I know its cooked but i dont want to go through the effort of reinstalling.

    [–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

    damn. that's literally me.

    On Nixos

    No nixpkg Make flake

    [–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

    Be me, build a Dockerfile to do all that shit in a nice CI package, still can't run it.

    [–] gerowen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

    Flatpak/flathub is your friend. I've been using Linux for 20+ years and I'm to a point where if it's not available as a deb, flatpak, system package or at the bare minimum an executable binary/script I just don't bother. Compiling should be done by the software vendor and not required of the user unless they specifically want or need to.

    [–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

    Oh sweet Jesus! LOL! This is me, though not with Linux, but trying to use Macports to get some damn program running and failing miserably because I couldn't get the permissions set on the dependencies correctly.

    Rake right to the face. FML.

    load more comments
    view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί