this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
227 points (98.3% liked)

General Memes & Private Chuckle

362 readers
802 users here now

Welcome to General Memes

Memes for the masses, chuckles for the chosen.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CruelWe’re here for laughs, not fights.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it light — argue in the comments, not with insults

Rule 2: No Forbidden FormatsNot every image deserves immortality on the memmlefield. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (seriously, don’t ruin the fun)
  • NSFW memes must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can take care of it.

Otherwise consider this your call to duty. Get posting or laughing. Up to you

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm only listening for key action phrase and

**RADICAL DISSENT** 
[–] Bubs@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

AFAIK, those devices have two systems.

The subsystem only listens for the keyword. It doesn't have any capability to process the whole question you ask. Its only job is to listen for the keyword and then send the relevant audio to the main system.

The main system is what's connected to the Internet. Only it can send the audio file to the mother ship to be processed.

With this setup, they improve general security by ensuring only the keyword audio is accessible to the processing center of the device.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I totally believe this. Yes. Absolutely.

When would a major corporation from a culture that jacks off to cyberpunk dystopia lie?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

You don't think some nerd would have caught the network traffic on his firewall? Had a buddy watch his scrolling logs for giggles.

No trust involved. Filter logs to only display the device, turn the mic off, talk at it. You don't think anyone ever tested this for giggles?

I'd try but my Minis are in the ceilings, can't get to the microphone switch.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

You don't think they can detect MITM? Don't you need a setup in the device itself to monitor traffic, but the system will be oblivious to it?

Do you think E2EE is only for consumers? How do you know if e2ee traffic from OS is asking for an "update" or is a tracking beacon or activity monitor?

I am genuinely interested in knowing how this could be caught without their Google specific source code.

Google is not a startup with engineers just out of college. It literally hires staff from spy agencies.

You think they sell someone within a degree of someone who could do that the same hardware as the average rube?

You think they can't do shadow-mesh bullshit like TV's do?

You think they transmit all data in the moment thwy receive it?

And... Do you know anyone who has tried? I haven't.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure it's true on like a schematics level but honestly this is mostly consumer placating and not like any actual hindrance to the thing listening in on everything you say

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yea, that's believable. Sure there are 2 microphones in there and one can't be turned off by the user, but don't worry, the 2nd mic sucks and can't listen to you!

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

When a mother ship and a father ship love each other very much, the mother ship will lay eggs inside your ear canal and /#REDACTED#/