While it really shouldn't have to be spelled out, I still appreciate that they did.
CosplayGirls
A community featuring SFW Cosplay Girls.
Rules
- Females Only
- Any post containing nudity /suggestive poses should be marked NSFW.
- Cosplayer name should be mentioned in the title.
- No Promotions in title.
- Follow general lemmy.world rules.
Please headover to CosplayBabes for nsfw cosplay girls.

Lara Croft by CyberKittyXO

Harley Quinn by KayPikeFashion
It does communicate the stance of the event organizers, which is not a given.
Yeah, sadly, it does need to be directly and explicitly stated, literally in giant bold letters, with an actual accompanying example mascot...
But it is better that something like this is present than it not being present.
The amount of horny that goes into a Comicon (regardless of gender and orientation) is through the roof, so I 100% get that sign.
And here's the thing, consent is sexy-- people can and very much do hook up at these things! Just don't be a fucking creep about it.
I mean, one could be forgiven if they thought they were at a strip club. But still, groping strippers without consent is a no no as well.
No more revealing than a bikini, nobody normal bats an eye at this shit at the beach or a pool
Damn girl.....aren't you, like.....cold? Convention centers typically have the AC crankin'.
I guess it’s the only way for women’s clothes to have pockets. This ought to become a thing
The inverse of traditional women's clothing, only pockets, nothing else
Hey, you're the guy who argued that consent isn't important the other day and then deleted your posts when you got pushback, remember that? You said coercion is fine
cosplaying nonon jakuzure from kill la kill
Mmmm I can smell the sexual frustration and axe body spray in the comments.

Who would not be looking? To dress like that and expect otherwise is sadistic IMO. She is beautiful and sexy AF.
IMO she has every right to dress however she wants. That is in no way consent to touch or invade her personal space, but it is an open invitation to take in and admire the art. That includes observing the art at a magnitude similar to the extraordinary nature of the state of dress.
In the 4chan post this came from, there are mp4 vids of people doing undercarriage shots and looking for wardrobe malfunctions. Perhaps those are staged and consensual; I am not here to judge if others do or do not consent to such behavior. I am odd in these types of emotions because I am more of an ideal outlier male; tall, broad shoulders, average+ looks. If I were a girl, I would be a slut that likes the attention; I am a slut that likes the attention... lol. I don't want some random person walking up and touching me in a cycling kit, but if you want to look at the bulge in my shorts, whatever, I don't care. I did not wear them for you. I wear them for a reason, but if I am in public and you look, it would be idiotic of me to get offended.
Anyways, it may be outlier behavior for someone that wants to be looked at, but that is a totally valid choice in life too. Being sadistic about dressing in an extraordinarily revealing way and then complaining about people looking, is just as bad as the malevolent deviant that believes any form of clothing or external context is consent from another person. Even full open and explicit nudity in any public or private context is not de facto or implied consent.