Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
Cross-posted from "ideas are not property, they cannot be stolen" by @_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus in !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
The current system certainly is, but something like CC BY-SA seems to me to be fair. You shouldn't get unlimited exploitation of ideas, stories, etc., but attribution is hardly onerous and seems deserved.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html
Don't accept the enemy's framing of the issue.
Eh, We'd rather not listen to a misogynist creep (Stallman).
yikes.
Lol, just accept the enemy’s framing of the issue. Your life will be so much more serene!
We do not support either ip or stallman, that site defending stallman reads the typical right wing"objective" etc bullshit, or at least patriarchal rhetoric. Maybe don't sound like that if you want us to believe you.
Besides, we have seen first hand what stallman has said, we don't believe he is somebody worth listening to.
No, but work on realizing those ideas can certainly be undermined.
This is a great example of modern Internet "either one thing or what I randomly decide is its opposite is correct".
Absolutely modern copyright is broken and unfit for purpose, absolutely the ability to correctly assign authorship is useful, absolutely there is value to exclusive monetization rights for authors, certainly the ability to assign those to corporations is overexploited in the current model.
All of those things are true at once and I'm pretty sure the unavoidable overhaul of a trillion dollar conglomerate of industrial and cultural dependencies worldwide is not going to end up fitting in a meme.
Truth.
Copyright is a game we play to provide monetary incentive for making stuff, because making is hard and copying is easy.
Which means that even if you're a fan of this game - when there's no money involved, fuck off.