this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

819 readers
457 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

highlights


I think we want to avoid coupling men’s rights and issues to sexism, alt-right, Trumpism, you name it. Not that that always happens (r/mensrights f ex isn’t so bad as some people think it is) but the risk is always there.

Some people here want the sub to be for ‘moderate’ men’s advocates, or even something between r/mensrights and r/menslib. They shun every thought that even vaguely smells of traditionalism and rather avoid evpsych. I’m not one of them, but not everyone here has to be the same.

I’d like to figure out a theory how male competitiveness - AND female preferences for competitive males, this is crucial - brought us this totally insane neoliberal capitalism including limitless growth and pollution, but I never found the time to formulate it right. That would be real left wing male advocacy imho.


We're socialists, as Hitler, Gevara, Pol Pot, Stalin, Marx


The left-right divide is nowadays understood as encompassing three separate questions:

  • repartition of wealth, with equality being left and disparity being right

  • authority, with the right favouring more authoritarian policies such as more policing, harsher sentences or a stronger executive, and the left favouring a more reparative justice and a more pluralist political syste

  • individual freedom, with the right favouring traditionnal social structures and the left prefering individual life choices (regarding sex, drugs, children...)

  • I would add the outgroup-ingroup divide, with the left being more favourable to the inclusion of as many people (and/or animals) as possible in the ingroup and the right being more restricted in who they consider peers.

Sometimes "leftists" will be on the right or even the far right on some axis. Anybody who is left on any axis can have a claim to be "leftwing" and that sub reflects that well.

You can find garden variety marxists, social libertarians, anti-authoritarians, and humanists or vegetarians rubbing elbows in here. It's quite pleasant as it favours rich debate and wards off the Reddit echo chamber effect to a certain extent.


The number one reason I am a leftist (I prefer the term liberal) is equality. I think everyone should be treated equally as individuals. This is why I have a hard time supporting feminism because a lot of feminists either disregard, downplay, or even detest men’s rights.


welcome back gregor strasser

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
  • Pol Pot
  • men's rights

Yeah, okay, we're going to need a large abandoned mine for these people

[–] D61@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

AND female preferences for competitive males, this is crucial - brought us this totally insane neoliberal capitalism

stalin-gun-1 marx-joker

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 6 months ago

a new national bolshevism for a new incel era.

[–] Babs@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago

Are women bourgeois?

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago

If this guy was anti vegan, pro Israel and free market socialist it would be either the perfect bit. or a chat gpt psyop

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago
[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why are men's groups so reactionary? You would think in theory that men could form a group that isn't, but whenever you investigate even a little, they always are

[–] D61@hexbear.net 14 points 6 months ago

Instead of being a group of guys organized around fighting sexism and patriarchy through understanding how those two bad things negatively affect them.... its a group of guys desperately trying to justify a "kinder, gentler" sexism and patriarchy.

Case in point...

AND female preferences ... this is crucial - brought us ... neoliberal capitalism

[–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

yes, oh yes.. Real, coherent, definitely-not-3-chronically-online-libs-in-a-trenchcoat leftists™ refer to men and women exclusively as "males" and "females". Dialectics is when you try to distinguish yourself from perennial liberalism while not actually distinguishing yourself from liberalism.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago

The number one reason I am a leftist (I prefer the term liberal)

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.