this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
123 points (98.4% liked)

Opensource

3925 readers
234 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] troed@fedia.io 23 points 5 days ago (4 children)

This bugs me. I selected between pfSense and OpnSense a few years ago and got the impression pfSense's support and UI was better. I'm not looking forward to having reconfigure everything if switching :/

[–] coronach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

Been very happy with OPNsense since switching a few years ago.

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

I made the switch. It was a good excuse to clean up my config though.

I ended up installing it in a VM initially, just so I could configure it how I needed before going live. Then made a config backup, installed opnsense, then restored the config (after changing the interface names)

I'll never go back to pfsense.

[–] genuineparts@infosec.pub 8 points 5 days ago

There are some convertors that can wrangle a pfsense config into opnsense. I had the exact same issue and exact same thought about two years ago. But I do like Opnsense much, much more nowadays.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Tried OpenSense twice, always fell back to pfSense.

Plus, work gave me a rackmount Netgate appliance, so I'm on it until that unit dies.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t this why we have OpnSense?

[–] somewa@suppo.fi 36 points 5 days ago (3 children)

No, OPNsense doesn't exist because of pfsense false advertising and misleading people to think it's open source.

More like it exists because of pfsense not being open source. This has nothing to do with the advertising.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 4 points 5 days ago

Ok. Shakin my head here. I certainly believed pfSense was opensource.
I switched to OPNsense this year, mostly because that's what we use at work.
It sounds like I'm on the right one then?
Or is somebody next week gonna tell me OPNsense is a fully corporate orphan crushing operation?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What's proprietary about pfSense? Been using it for a decade and this is news to me.

[–] coronach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

The article is a good start. For one, you cannot build it. They have some sort of proprietary blob in their toolchain so that only netgate can build it.

Between that, the massive security fuckups, and the absolutely horrid behavior from the maintainers I dumped that shit and haven't looked back.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Feel free to make additions here: https://consumerrights.wiki/Netgate


Clicking link leading to https://forum.netgate.com/#msg759561 and https://forum.netgate.com/#msg754001
Gave me [[error:blacklisted-ip]]


The user whose Bug was removed from the website, made a clone bug report. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8215

Comparing the report on the site with the screenshot:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

just use OpenWRT, it has all the same shit

[–] artiman@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

I'm not a networking expert but OpenWrt on my homelab is pretty fucking awesome

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Netgate are shitbags. Fuck pfSense.

[–] mcmodknower@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Btw that seems to be a fork/reupload of a DMCA'd repo.

[–] artiman@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i don't seem to see a dmca notice in the forked from project

[–] mcmodknower@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

If you click links in the readme (i only tried the last two ones) you get a dmca takedown message.