Wait wait wait. They finally went full width with that goddamn camera bump, a move that could radically improve the physical user experience by finally allowing this thing to rest evenly on a flat surface. Then, they put another set of camera bumps on the camera bump to ensure that it never does this. Honestly, this is like an elaborate, slow rolling practical joke at this point.
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
63 points (88.9% liked)
Apple
19446 readers
6 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A camera bump in a camera bump is definitely a choice.
Yo dawg….
The lenses already protruded like this. They use more real estate inside the device now, though, and it rolls less than before. An improvement is there :)
How much they charging for the Trump dick sucking model?
That's every Apple product... Then again that's nearly every large, American tech company...
Ike it or not, and for the record I don’t, the price for that model is “the same as last year”.
load more comments
(3 replies)
it is kind of a gold colour
Whole lot of nothing
So they went back to aluminum eh? The cheaper an weaker material is going bring the cost down, right? Right?
Titanium was always a bad choice for thermals. Now they have the Air as the princess phone and the Pros look designed to perform not to look, seems like.
Aluminium is much lighter than titanium, so these phones will at least be lighter right?
I'm sorry to have to disappoint you. It keeps getting heavier (and larger).
Somehow they managed to make it heavier, 206g for the 17 Pro vs 199g for the 16 Pro. They’ve been hovering at around 200g for a while though, so as ugly as that phone is, it probably isn’t noticeably heavier than like a 13 Pro
More battery tho
The metal frame is a tiny fraction of the overall cost.
Aluminum was the better material for this use case. All that’s changed is Apple is finally admitting it.
I would be more interested in a budget-camera option if it meant price reduction and no bump. If that were also the one not solely marketed in the hands of 22-year-old fashionistas, all the better.
We have the same complaint lol. I’d buy the base iPhone if it had the same processing power as the Pro, and that’s exactly what I did with the 12 generation.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I know the camera bumps have been getting bigger over time, but this is just too much. These are definitely the ugliest iPhones ever released.
Honestly i kinda like it, looks neat. Not that i’d ever buy one but looks neat.
I don't think it's pretty, but it does have way more "personality" in its design than any iphone before. I prefer that over pretty
The iPhone X and XS are the ones I think looked the best
Orange Pro instant buy. Those cameras are really promising, battery life looks to be impressive and thermals well managed. My iPhone XS can retire peacefully.
I upgraded to a 16 Pro Max from an XS Max last year, and this announcement is really ensuring that I made the correct decision. It looks like a fine phone, but the cameras and battery life and speed of the 16 pro max are already insane.
I’m waiting for a watch announcement though, I’d love to finally upgrade my Series 0 that I’ve had forEVER to whatever last year’s model is for cheap.
I’d love to finally upgrade my Series 0
How's the battery life holding up on that?
It’s lasts about as long as it does to read this sentence.
Eight hours! Almost ten years!
I’m a slow reader :-p
Twice as long as my series 0, if I took it out of the junk drawer
Amazing construction site optics 🚧🏗️
view more: next ›