this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
415 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

74594 readers
3989 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Good article! Thanks for the archive link. Amazing that this type of shady shit which Tesla is doing is likewise behind a paywalled source where people can’t get this information as easily.

Inside a Starbucks near the Miami airport, the plaintiffs’ attorneys watched as greentheonly fired up his ThinkPad computer and plugged in a flash drive containing a forensic copy of the Autopilot unit’s contents. Within minutes, he found key data that was marked for deletion — along with confirmation that Tesla had received the collision snapshot within moments of the crash — proving the critical information should have actually been accessible all along.

The attorneys high-fived behind him.

Basically too, Tesla has also tried to delete the data again by powering up the unit from the crash, which would have ‘updated’ the device and conveniently removed data. How STRANGE it maintains this behavior… especially for collision snapshots.

Tesla is actively harming people, lying about it, and using shitty tactics to avoid any responsibility for it. Just like its daddy, Elon.

Seriously. This is so fucked yo. I’m NEVER EVER going to buy Tesla.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago

Clear fraud and an attempt to undermine the American public.

Tesla and SpaceX are some of the largest welfare receivers in the country. But they refuse to take accountability or clean up their messes.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 168 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So they lied. And they'll lie again. And they'll get away with it.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 26 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Well they have to pay 200+ million. So im not sure if "get away" is the right word. But I get the sentiment. Its a tragedy.

"It took the jury less than a day of deliberation to find Tesla 33 percent liable for the crash and responsible for $243 million in punitive and compensatory damages."

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 25 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Almost 100 billion revenue last year.

250 million of 100 billion is what… 0.25%?

Yeah. That’s nothing to them.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 12 hours ago

it never is. fines should be a percentage of the value of the company, not just some sum.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You'd need to do the math on net profit. Gross revenue is a pretty meaningless figure on its own.

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Or, y'know, don't do illegal things and it doesn't matter. That's the point of fines being a deterrent

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 12 hours ago

Want to fine Twitter 10% for something horrible they did in 2020 using their net profit? You now owe Twitter 113 million.

[–] eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Well, net income already had plummeted 52% then. Let's see 2025 figures. Sales are down, down, down..

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 83 points 16 hours ago

Tesla? The same company, that was revealed to delete sensitive data out of the crashed vehicles, after it was remotely downloaded, and pretend it was "mysteriously" unavailable?

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 60 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The information was key for a wrongful death case the survivor and the victim’s family were building against Tesla, but the company said it didn’t have the data.

Then a self-described hacker, enlisted by the plaintiffs to decode the contents of a chip they recovered from the vehicle, found it while sipping a Venti-size hot chocolate at a South Florida Starbucks. Tesla later said in court that it had the data on its own servers all along.

Joel Smith, Tesla’s attorney, said in an interview that the company was “clumsy” in its handling of the data but did not engage in any impropriety with regard to it. “It is the most ridiculous perfect storm you’ve ever heard,” Smith said, in an effort to explain why Tesla was unable to produce the collision snapshot data until after the hacker retrieved it for the plaintiffs.

In court, Smith told jurors in his opening statement that Tesla would “never think about hiding” the data because it proved that the driver had time to react to the pedestrians standing by their parked car had he been paying attention.

“We didn’t think we had it, and we found out we did,” he said. “And, thankfully, we did because this is an amazingly helpful piece of information.”

For reference, here is a poem called the Narcissist's Prayer:

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

If I was on the jury or I was the judge in a non-jury trial and this happened, I would have pushed for the largest decision possible. No company or person should be allowed to act like this.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 32 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The jury basically did exactly that. They weren't buying Tesla's multi-year denial that they had the data as an "oopsy doopsy" story.

They found Tesla liable for $235 million. It's the first case Tesla hasent been able to settle, and that's a big ol' number. They are going to have more lawsuits coming.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Tesla’s attorney, said in an interview that the company was “clumsy” in its handling of the data but did not engage in any impropriety with regard to it.

You know what really ticks me off? Every driving Joe and Jane learns that negligence or ignorance or "clumsiness" does not excuse you from breaking the rules.

A very basic tenet of lawfulness. Which does not seem to apply to multi-billion-money-corpos.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

And it’s strange, because corporations are sposto be people now right?

What a fucking joke.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 23 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm sure whoever is in charge into the government, who will have no interests in this, is going to definitely look into Tesla. /s

[–] redditexcommunicado@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago

Nothing too surprising here