this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
44 points (97.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4315 readers
4 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
44
What you're looking at here is advanced warfare. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

+10 damage for the sticker.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nice trigger discipline, fuckwad. (though he might be on a range, I guess)

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I assumed he was on a range, but they should both be wearing hearing protection in that case.

[–] teft@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In the full picture the rifle appears to have a silencer.

[–] HotDayBreeze@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is he going to break his cheekbone when it kicks, or is holding the gun with your face standard procedure?

[–] teft@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You want your cheek on the buttstock when you shoot because it gives you a more consistent sight picture. The rifle kicks backwards, not upwards. You don't want your eyes near the optics because of that backwards movement. That can get you a black eye if you're too close.

His shooting stance looks fine except for his chicken wing sticking out. Tuck that in or get it shot off.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Steel scopes are unforgiving. In the FACE!

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

5.56mm is notorious for its monstrous recoil, so you have a valid point.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is... is that a proper buttstock, or some 'armbrace' nonsense?

https://danieldefense.com/daniel-defense-collapsible-buttstock-black.html

Am I going blind, or is... this not the thing he's holding?

To me it looks more like DD's 'pistol brace'.

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/products2.cfm/ID/326053/0218906272/daniel-defense-dd-pcc-9mm-pistol-with-sb-tactical-sb3-5-position-adjustable-arm-brace

Now... if I am not going blind, and not losing my mind...

How did this happen?

Why is there not a real buttstock on this rifle?

Who fucked this up?

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I regret to inform you that you are indeed going blind. The buttstock looks nothing like the pistol brace you linked to.

If it is not a SOPMOD B5 Bravo buttstock, it is something very close to it.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Ok, thats honestly great news, as I actually know I have an astigmatism, and need to replace my glasses I lost a few years back.

Thand god, oh fuck I was freaking out that somehow pistol braces were destined for actual military/combat use.

Oi vei...

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You would be great at CinemaSins.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Incorrectly judged the context, jumped to hysterical conclusion?

Ding!

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It's a proper vuttstock, the guy just doesn't know what to do with his right arm.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Suss sticker