this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
1248 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74559 readers
4240 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine what the economy would look like if they spent 30 billion on wages.

[–] GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If we're just talking about the USA, then the ~200 million working people would get $150 each.

[–] millie@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We could always just confiscate all fortunes over 900 million dollars.

The 5 richest billionaires have a combined $1.154 trillion, which divided by $340 million gives us $3,394 per American citizen. That's literally just the top 5. According to Forbes there were 813 billionaires in 2024. Sounds pretty damned substantial to me. We're talking life-altering amounts of money for every American without even glancing in the direction of mere hundred-millionaires. And all the billionaires could still be absurdly wealthy.

[–] brem@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Does the 30 billion also account for allocated resources (such as the incredibly demanding amount of electricity required to run a decent AI for millions if not billions of future doctors and engineers to use to pass exams)?

Does it account for the future losses of creativity & individuality in this cesspool of laziness & greed?

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago

Once again we see the Parasite Class playing unethically with the labour/wealth they have stolen from their employees.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

My experience with AI so far is that I have to waste more time fine tuning my prompt to get what I want and still end up with some obvious issues that I have to manually fix and the only way I would know about these issues is my prior experience which I will stop gaining if I start depending on AI too much, plus it creates unrealistic expectations from employers on execution time, it's the worst thing that has happened to the tech industry, I hate my career now and just want to switch to any boring but stable low paying job if I don't have to worry about going through months for a job hunt

[–] boor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Similar experience here. I recently took the official Google “prompting essentials” course. I kept an open mind and modest expectations; this is a tool that’s here to stay. Best to just approach it as the next Microsoft Word and see how it can add practical value.

The biggest thing I learned is that getting quality outputs will require at least a paragraph-long, thoughtful prompt and 15 minutes of iteration. If I can DIY in less than 30 minutes, the LLM is probably not worth the trouble.

I’m still trying to find use cases (I don’t code), but it often just feels like a solution in search of a problem….

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Sounds like we all just wamt to retire as goat farmers. Just like before. The more things change....they say

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Does this mean they'll invest the money in paying workers? No... they're just have to double down.

[–] BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

But it's okay, because MY company is AHEAD OF THE CURVE on those 95% losses

[–] ShittDickk@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

hello, welcome to taco bell, i am your new ai order specialist. would you like to try a combo of the new dorito blast mtw dew crunchwrap?

spoken at a rate of 5 words a minute to every single person in the drive thru. the old people have no idea how to order with a computer using key words.

[–] bigbabybilly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. No shit. wtf did they think was gonna generate returns? They wanna run ads in the middle if responses?

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I'm not sure they were expecting returns. Just afraid that if other companies had AI, they might lose business to them. Except of course a lot of people (or at least I) avoid anything with AI and mistrust its results.

[–] pika@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

The link in the article to the MIT report doesn't directly link to any report. I wouldn't trust this article until the report is accessible and verifiable.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

30-40 billion USD in total worldwide over three years seems very little compared to the massive expenditures by the AI companies to build the things?

MANY companies aren’t profitable for several years. The one I work at wasn’t for 2 decades. It’s a long game.

[–] world_cavve@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For me that aren't good with scripting AI can actually fill a educational role. Or at least point me in correct direction so I can complete the rest myself.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

I feel like we could find ways and tools to help in that situation without stealing the entirety of human knowledge, boiling our planet, and spending a small nation's GDP. Like better code library discovery or a better mentor environment amongst coders.

I've also seen plenty of people get pointed in the exact wrong way to do things by leaning on generative AI and then have to spend even more time getting back on track.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 263 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Imagine how much more they could've just paid employees.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 150 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's as if it's a bubble or something...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›