Linux Gaming

Eh, I don't find dnf very limiting nor do I frequently get stymied by a missing package.

Debian Stable

Arch. If it's not a server, arch. Always arch.

GTX 1080 + i7 4790K here: I run an Arch Linux Wayland setup (labwc) on my machine. So I use this for gaming, too.

I have a handful of native games running without any issues. Other games I run on Steam (installed via Flatpak to avoid the 32 bits dependency hell). Never had any REAL issues that were not coming from Nvidia not running well on Linux or Valve not getting Linux support right.

Void Linux with XFCE on my desktop, and Bazzite on my media center PC.

I started with Bazzite but wanted a system that wasn't immutable, so I switched to Garuda. Both have been easy and reliable.

arch on a walmart gaming laptop, hooked up to an old external monitor

I don't think the hard part of linux is getting proprietary GPU drivers. They all have package managers that will grab them for you, after quick google search anyway. Mint will have the most specific google support for more esoteric problems/goals. Pika OS includes gpu driver bundles and is similarly debian based. But it wasn't good at waking from sleep on my old hardware with 1650super. Too hard to fix.

What I've found is that what works bet for your preferences and build is best. When I had an Nvidia card, Pop!_OS worked best for stable performance. I'm not a fan of Gnome though and it got me to upgrade to an AMD card and I've moved to Bazzite with no regrets.

Mint. I've been happy with it. I'm more familiar with debs/apt/Ubuntu so I wanted to stick with something familiar but didn't want to use Ubuntu. It's worked very well for me for gaming. I just upgraded my GPU from an Nvidia card to an AMD card which, aside from having to manually install the drivers from the terminal, has worked very well.

Up to a couple of days ago was using arch linux, now using opensuse tumbleweed.

So far I got the same experience in both, and most of the issues I got were related to my poor understanding on how to properly setup Hyprland when using a minimal installation setup.

I guess the distro itself wont make that much difference.

I just run Arch, I've been an Arch guy for years and never saw any reason to switch

I'm using Manjaro because I wanted a rolling release distro that focused on kde, and SuSE didn't feel like downloading that day. No problems here

Fedora atm, I heard it's pretty good I haven't really tried anything else.

CachyOS KDE + Windows 11 debloated dualboot with games on shared BTRFS drive and WinBtrfs driver

Arch Linux. I wanted to try Hyprland with something and I felt like it was the easiest with Arch.

I use it for general things as well, but I have MX Linux on my laptop and it works well enough for the type of games I play ( nothing all that requirement heavy ). Steam's Proton works fine. So does WINE for modern games.

I've tried WINE without any tinkering on a couple old abandonware games ( 3D-Ultra Minigolf and some other game ) and both had issues with scaling, fitting into their borderless window, and crashing when selecting a menu button thing. So, older titles like those might be out of the question... if I don't try them on DOSBox.

I use stock Arch with i3wm. My girlfriend uses Nobara with KDE.

I'm on Mint with an RTX 3060ti and Ryzen 5. Pretty much everything "just worked" except for the proprietary software for rebinding my mouse and gaming controller. I found alternative software for the mouse (Logitech g300s) but I'm still having difficulty with the controller (8bitdo Ultimate 2).

Guix

SteamOS on a Steam Deck.

When I want to game, I want to game, not be stuck playing a round of "tech support simulator"

Windows 11 :/

Though heavily neutered, where even defender is disabled.

I boot CachyOS Linux with a lot of tuning (and some recent game testing). A linux gaming OS! I'm using Cachy like 95% of the time; I am not anti linux.

But honestly... It's just not worth a few lost features and performance hit over Windows for me, on top of the extra hassle. Its easier to just reboot. Maybe the experience is different on AMD GPUs, but I suspect Nvidia is at a disadvantage here.

This is on a desktop. Based on my experience with a RTX 2060 laptop I used to have, you also have the to deal with graphics switching, rendering on one device while displayong on another, and making sure your 1050 actually goes to sleep when not in use.