Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
you write it in a special programming language, which is basically English, which describes how you want to see this application in a very specified way
A derivative of English, with different syntax and rules to help eliminate ambiguities? We in the industry tend to call that "code".
This is how cobol was created
So another 4th generation language that no one uses. Great.
That's a long list of words I have never heard of. I do like how SQL somehow fits the bill of a 4GL.
It makes sense, you aren't telling sql server how to do something, you just tell it what you want and it figures it out. You aren't even doing procedural stuff at that point.
I like the RAD tools being qualified as 4GLs as I haven't really thought of them that way but again it makes sense.
Also screw PowerBuilder. I am sorry if anyone in this thread likes it...but it is seriously awful.
Edit: Before people jump me, I do know that you have some influence over execution plans with join orders, hints, etc.. but by and large you don't tell SQL Server how to do it's job.
Never used Power Builder, but used to touch Pro4 and Pega Systems in different jobs. They were both middle manager programming UI’s
which is basically English, which describes how you want to see
It will be a mix between Basic and Cobol. I like what JetBrains do, but that's a stupid idea.
I'm guessing it'll be closer to bytecode, since they're very java focused.
Nobody writes byte code directly.
That is not what I said.
They're designing a language that supposedly writes like English. Why would you not compile English straight to bytecode? Since they made Kotlin run in the jvm, they're likely gonna make this run on the jvm as well. They could make another intermediate language, but they could also make an advances interpreter or compiler that compiles english straight to bytecode. Nobody needs to read or write that, they reading and wrting English.
Also, yes they do. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbNv6rdYJL0
Maybe not many and even less do it proffesionally, but its not none
Another chatgpt wrapper sold as gold subscription.
That's my bet.
This kind of seems like a solution in search of a problem. Most modern high level programming languages are easily readable, 'english oriented', and already capable of at least some level of cross platform development.
One of the main problems with any programing language or framework is that flexibility breeds complexity. If they seriously think they're going to lower the complexity of programming by allowing devs to write programs [essentially] in plain English, and then let AI do the rest, I think it's a recipe for disappointment.
It's the "I'm scared of brackets" crowd again.
I don't have high hopes for it to be actually useful. They already have Kotlin, which feels like a playground for language designers.
Yeah... Kotlin is an unreadable nightmare.
This kind of seems like a solution in search of a problem
Not like it's a bad things. A lot of inventions started this way.
But also, a lot of programming languages exist simply because a programmer really wanted to write a programming language.
Yes, and it's good that programming languages are still experimented with, otherwise we'd still be writing assembly.
Naw, This is honestly the direction that software engineering is going to go. AI becomes more capable over time.
We are eventually going to stop writing code and focus more on writing specifications. The development of languages that allow us to write and maintain better specifications is going to accelerate that in the same way, that higher level languages allowed us to accelerate writing code for the purpose of it being transformed into some form of bytecode. We are now in the early stages of needing a language that better facilitates the authoring of detailed specifications that can then be ran through code generation in more predictable and scalable manners.
I see nothing wrong with developing a new language. If it works it works. If it doesn't it doesn't and we all learned new shit. I'm not sure why so many people in this thread hate science.
We are eventually going to stop writing code and focus more on writing specifications.
I don't think this will happen in my lifetime.
i mean isn't it a kind of old thing in that companies usually have somewhat separate designers and programmers?
I don’t understand why you’re getting downvoted. While I don’t share your conviction, I do admit it’s certainly a possibility.
The advantage of doing things that way is that code becomes much more portable. We may finally reach the goal of “write once, run anywhere”, because the AI may write all the platform specific code.
It does make a big assumption that the AI output is reliable enough though. At times people will want to tweak the output, so how are they gonna go about that? Maybe if the language is based on Markdown, you can inject snippets of code where necessary. But if you have to do that too often, such a language will lose its appeal.
There’s a lot of unknowns, but I see why it’s a tempting idea.
They need to call it COBOL. A language regular business people can use!
The language is in the works but JetBrains has not revealed a timeline for general availability at this point.
Won’t hold my breath for this ever shipping.
Assuming there will be an LLM involved because that’s what seems to be all AI is these days. How on earth they plan to get reproducible builds from this thing is beyond me (suppose that’s one reason I don’t work for JetBrains).
It sounds like it uses similar ideas to Amazon Kiro. Many of the advancements in “vibe coding” tools are focused on ways to put consistent, coherent bumpers on AI output.
Surely through an intermediate - real - language?
Do they really need it when kotlin exists?
What they are aiming for (not agreeing, just explaining) is a language that you can use to ask AI to do things for you.
The idea is that you do not have to do the nuts and bolts programming (the AI will do that) but at the same time you have more deterministic control over what the AI does.
So “higher level” than our highest level languages now.
Does it involve AI?
Yep!
developing a new programming language intended to make AI and code much more controllable and transparent
Don't worry, no details on how a language would achieve that
Oh okay.
The idea is that the programming language is closer to natural language, which is what LLMs do best.
I read that part. It's just that isn't really a proposal on "how" and more a tagline of every high level programming language since the 80s, including the AI all-star, Python
"JetBrains is exploring how to make this new language a derivative from Kotlin, but Skrygan believes the derivative should be English."
That sounds like (Visual) Basic. It looks like English but it's basically pseudo-code.
I'm happy letting AI and my language server write all the extra annotations for Rust, i've no trouble reading them. I have much more trouble when types and usage specifiers/limiters are missing.
“So instead of writing three applications, you write it in a special programming language, which is basically English, which describes how you want to see this application in a very specified way, and then AI agents, together with JetBrains tooling, will generate the code of all of these platforms,” Skrygan said.
