this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

605 readers
3 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology. Questions and support posts are also welcome, so long as they are relevant to hardware and interesting technologies therein.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] commander@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like that's just softening the eventual news blow for stock holders. How big of an order will a major customer want to commit to. Who wants to be guinea pig for a foundry that has been bad news for a decade+

Hindsight 20/20. Over invested in foundry capacity. Maybe should have started with less capacity and be happy building up with a bunch of lower volume customers to raise confidence with the big customers

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It'll be US gov, military or Israel, since they make a load of chips there. The US government will not let intel fail.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Military doesn't use cutting edge dies like 14A. Armed forces prefer rock solid performance under duress from older, larger dies. Not 8086 levels, but like 45nm architecture. The older dies have the benefit of mature logistics and material sources which make supply more reliable while years of iterative manufacturing QC has driven the costs to the lowest possible.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Military wants to build AI drones -- that can't be done with legacy nodes.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What drone uses 14A chips? Most drones use chips from a decade ago because they are cheap and numerous.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The cheap drones currently in use require human control. The next generation will be autonomous with automatic targeting, so no human input and impervious to jamming. This requires a lot of processing power. The world is about to become a very scary place....

[–] couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

This is not necessarily true. The navy ships house plenty of newer generation rack mounted computers and other hardware.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wanna bet?

They would try to kill Intel if they knew about their DEI program but fortunately, they may be too stupid to notice yet.