this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4609 readers
101 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Courtesy of "prestigious" China "experts" such as Gordon G. Chang, this piece is set in an alternate reality where:

the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) strengthens its regime and pursues global dominance

Chinese economic growth is declining drastically under misguided policies

The housing market is in crisis

Political corruption in the CCP, bureaucratic inefficiency, and other waste also hinder economic progress and public trust.

And this is just the first paragraph! Of the document's summary!

From the same summary, this document seems to be basically China hawks salivating at how they'll imperialize China once again... at least in their imagination, since this scenario is so far removed from reality, it makes one wonder if this is a serious piece meant to sway US policy, or an elaborate parody written by communists to mock China hawks.

Some more gems (just from the summary; I'm not reading this garbage):

Diplomats and other officials at international organizations are increasingly skeptical of the China’s global influence, making foreign policy more difficult.

Yes, that's why more and more countries are signing trade deals with China.

The chapter [...] suggests that US special operations forces (SOF) can help stabilize a post-CCP China. It envisions SOF aiding provisional authorities, protecting critical infrastructure, and facilitating the peaceful emergence of a new government while working “by, with, and through” local actors.

Hmmm... how about: "It envisions the colonial occupation authorities protecting critical infrastructure for extracting super-profits, and facilitating the violent insertion of a puppet government while working through local compradors and other hanjians". There, much clearer.

Clarke then advocates for overhauling the Chinese economy by recapitalizing the country while a new government repudiates illegitimate debts, privatizes state assets, and implements decentralization [...] He emphasizes that CCP policies have constrained China’s economic potential and argues that a liberalized financial architecture is essential for both domestic prosperity and integration with global markets.

Shockwave therapy never gets old. Also, the Chinese economy isn't integrated with global markets? Ok cool, must be very easy to decouple then. Oh what's that, the US can't make weapons without Chinese rare earths? No more cheap treats? No more... anything? No, something doesn't add up...

Rick Fisher [...] recommends retaining a leaner, more accountable military force [...] A Chinese military force without hegemonic ambitions can then help a new government integrate into peacekeeping operations and space exploration partnerships.

No, you first.

Nina Shea discusses the importance of protecting human rights during a transitional period. According to her, the US should intervene to prevent ethnic violence, civil wars, and political retribution, with a special focus on China’s five autonomous regions— Guangxi, Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Ningxia. She also highlights the need for measures to alleviate the grievances of other groups, including religious minorities like Christians and the Falun Gong.

Truly impressive, the nerve and lack of shame on the authors.

China can only move beyond past evils through the investigation and public disclosure of those crimes. The chapter recommends establishing a national truth and reconciliation commission modeled after South Africa’s [...]

Again no, you first, and your zionist outpost too.

We've done it everyone, distilled brainrot!

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

This isn't necessarily fiction, it's a threat. This is their goal, this is what they plan on working towards with China. They recognise they can't compete with them economically, so they're going to leverage the west's soft power to try and destroy them. I don't know how well it will work, since the west's soft power is also waning, and racist anti-China attitudes are only really prevalent in the west, but it isn't a good idea to underestimate them.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

skeptical of the China’s global influence

Lmao is it actually written this way? Do they not have an editor?

[–] SugandeseDelegation@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yup, that's how they wrote it. It just makes it even harder to take the piece seriously

[–] materialanalysis1938@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Is this the beginning of a clear attitude shift towards China in the imperial core? Obviously westerners are trained to hate China but historically that’s been used to demonize communism and stoke chauvinism.

But there hasn’t been an attempt at manufacture consent for mounted antagonism against China yet. Maybe the imperialists are starting to think Chinese socialism is a threat after all

[–] SugandeseDelegation@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I don't see this being any different from their past attitude, except they're even more delusional now. They've basically compiled all the "China bad" disinformation tropes they've concocted over the years, and now they're acting as if it's a given they'll outlast the PRC and they're imagining how they'll carve it up, when in reality this is already unlikely and, so far, only getting less probable over time.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Imagine posing as intellectuals and then getting the acronym wrong.

The bar is so low I'm letting that one slide. They're surely doing it on purpose anyway

[–] miz@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

HeLLo, aNd wELcOmE tO "ThE DrAgOn RiSeS"

[–] miz@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] davel@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 days ago

Some of these people must know the party’s over. Will they look for new careers or soldier on with increasingly fantastic fanfic? “Senior Fellow and Director of China Center” must pay well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Institute#Funding