this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
255 points (97.4% liked)

Comic Strips

18285 readers
1455 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Below a sign that says "LOCAL ART GALLERY" and "ART IS RESISTANCE™", a cubist character is placing a sign that has the following text on it: "SUPPORT LOCAL ARTISTS $500".

Meanwhile, another cubist character, an annoying looking man in a suit, is telling "PLEASE GO AWAY, YOU ARE RUINING THE AESTHETIC" to another character.

Down in the corner, the character being talked to is drawn using curves and regular lines, they look homeless and depressed, and are holding a sign that reads "WILL DRAW FOR FOOD"

https://thebad.website/comic/starving_artists_not_welcome

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

$500 isn't exactly much, given how long art takes to produce, how relatively infrequently that art will be bought, and how many extra expenses a "self-employed" artist has. I expect that most people selling art for $500 are hobbyists with some other means of financial support, because they're not going to earn enough to live on by selling art. Portraying them as corporate sellouts is just silly.

(The exception might be some digital artists working on commission. But they're probably drawing furry porn rather than something you might see in a gallery.)

[–] Bad@jlai.lu 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, this is criticism of the bourgeois art scene and its "local galleries" undercutting artists to a point where only self sufficient artists can survive, while proletarian artists are treated as undesirables.

It's the same criticism Duchamp was doing of the art world updated for modern times. As we both lived in the same city at different times, it resonates with me.

The "portrayal as corporate sellouts" is a misinterpretation. Maybe my piece is hard to interpret though. Hard to tell since I can't have an objective point of view on it.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 1 points 4 days ago

My interpretation combined with my observations of the world is as follows.:

Bourgeoisie art scene is a sanitized/toned down version of proletarian art, which could be called more "raw" or "real". Fancy artists act as sort of explorers of raw art and pre-digest it so the (diluted) message can still somewhat reach those who wouldn't have looked at that real art.

They make more money simply because they come from this social class. They get "inspired" by poor artists and copy their style, making more money out of it.

Are they artists? Yeah... Are they true innovators? No way!

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

500 per piece of art is barely out of the struggling to eat level of artist. Be mad that the ones making 50000 each.

A large blank canvas alone is like a 100 bucks. If they are charging minimum wage for their time (they shouldn't) and spend no money on brushes or paints that gives them 25hours per piece, which isn't really that much time to be honest. Then hopefully you make enough in prints to pay the exhibitions cut and for time and money you spent marketing, networking, negotiating etc

Obviously there's all kinds of art which different time and material commitments but 500 bucks really isn't all that unreasonable.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Needs a third panel where the person is home on their computer using some bullshit AI to generate garbage facsimiles of art stolen from all artists within the range of both the other panels.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

should have been a furry porn artist.

[–] GrantUsEyes@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Love seeing original content here! :D

[–] Bad@jlai.lu 3 points 5 days ago

Thanks ❤️

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh wow, thanks for sharing the link! Lots of good stuff there. :D

[–] Bad@jlai.lu 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, glad you enjoy ❤️

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh! Vous êtes en fait l'auteur, n'est-ce pas?

Do you mind if I add a link in our "WEBCOMIX!" post? (2nd from top)
https://piefed.social/c/eurographicnovels

[–] Bad@jlai.lu 5 points 5 days ago

Oui!

Of course, with pleasure :)

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I guess you could say this is Bad content? Heh.

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

i like this, thanks for posting it