this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
566 points (98.6% liked)

Games

20495 readers
554 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A rare L for Steam.

Not exactly their fault, but I wonder what changed that made them start caring.

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Probably the last tweet that was posted on this thread, if PayPal was denying purchases in certain regions than steam would get scared

[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 1 points 5 days ago

That was kinda what I was alluding to. Apparently it worked before that, but they decided to make up extra rules or turned up enforcement.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 246 points 1 week ago (59 children)

On the one hand, oh noz, the incest games. Who will live without the low effort AI goon crap?

On the other hand, why do the payment companies get to dictate what sales are made? It's my fucking money, or my fucking store. It's not the job of the payment processors to determine if I'm buying illegal goods, just that the money goes from me to the store.

[–] lemjukes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I mean isn’t this effectively the problem bitcoin aimed to solve originally? Don’t get me wrong, crypto is fucked and I’m not advocating for it here per se. But a locally processed, secure, digital version of cash bypasses the need for any of this. Granted it bypasses the need for some of the most powerful institutions on the planet too, and so will never happen in a truly egalitarian sense.

Also just cause it’s bugging me, you understand that a credit card, or even a debit card or PayPal/venmo account, does not equate to ‘your money’ the way physical cash does, right?

Im not saying you shouldn’t have the right to privacy when making a purchase. But mandating the processors of that purchase ignore what that money is doing is a fools errand as that’s basically a core mechanism in their operation and generation of profit.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's been like this for a while in the porn industry. In an interview a while back, Bree Mills says she gets more limited by payment processors than the government (though that might be switching).

Ever wonder why every faux-incest video goes out of the way to say everyone is a step family? Step father, step daughter, step mother, step brother, all somehow living in the same house, over 18, and no blood relation? The first amendment protects them from the US government, so that's not why. Credit card companies are why. The old Taboo series was distributed differently back in the day. Can't make that anymore.

This also applies to some of the more extreme BDSM stuff, like blood play or scat. Won't find them on kink.com.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (57 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 127 points 1 week ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Payment processors should not be allowed to dictate what content they allow to be bought and what not. It's not their job to police people, let me live ffs

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 89 points 1 week ago (54 children)

It's only a matter of time before they come for furry stuff. They did it with fansly. It's apparently "simulated bestiality" and from what I've heard you aren't even allowed to reference trans puppy girls, pup play, etc without getting banned.

load more comments (54 replies)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I wouldn't really care if Steam decided to crack down on porn games, its their store. Payment processors being the ones to force Valve's hands simply doesn't sit right.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 57 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I didn't know this till I heard a podcast series about this, but the global rulemakes for porn are Visa and Mastercard. They decide what "goes too far" and remove a site from their service if they don't like it, effectively cutting off all revenue streams and killing the site. They did this with porn sites and threatened OnlyFans. There are a bunch of rules they've written for the industry (e.g. fingering an orofice with4 fingers was acceptable, but when the thumb goes in then it becomes "fisting" and this used to be unacceptable), but many rules are unwritten and have to be guessed.

I think this is the podcast series for anyone interested (although I heard this a long time ago and I'm not sure if it was a different series and I'm not going to listen again to confirm).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Transcriptnickyflowers: It would be cool if websites let you be an adult on them. The advertisers and payment processors need everything to be Family Friendly though their definitions of family and friendly are fucked. But since they're in charge of the Internet now, no one is allowed to be an adult. TikTokers say things like "unalive" and "seggs" because they know death and sex are too adult for online. Online is for idiot babies only now because they're easier to market to.

nickyflowers: Oh I'm sorry you're a trans adult? Super ban. You are super banned for life. You have upset Visa's feelings. Mastercard is throwing up in the corner. How could you do this to Google Ads?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This might sound like a good idea. But it is not, since lets say some topic is too sensitive for the payment processor, then they have monopoly on what game can and can not be allowed on Steam.

So in the long run, this is a bad idea.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This doesn't sound like a good idea in any way. Why the fuck do banks get to say how my money is used? They can literally eat my shit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 39 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not a fan of porn games (which aren't available here anyway), but that is not a good sign.

Why would they even cater to payment providers? They should not be able to determine whether you bought a porn game or a regular game, just that it's something on Steam.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›