this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
57 points (96.7% liked)

Actual Discussion

1146 readers
1 users here now

Are you tired of going into controversial threads and having people not discuss things, circlejerking, or using emotional responses in place of logic? Us too.

Welcome to Actual Discussion!

DO:

DO NOT:

For more casual conversation instead of competitive ranked conversation, try: !casualconversation@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. We try to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are highly encouraged as no-discussion downvotes don't help anyone learn anything valuable. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

We’re back! Instead of putting a neutral topic in the introduction, I'm placing a bit of opinion on an issue to see if it helps spur discussion. We are also actively seeking moderators and people who enjoy discussion (and understand that being wrong is an important part of being a better person)! Send me a message if you’d like to help out.

This week, I'd like to discuss something that's been a bit of an issue for me personally.

Lemmy (and Reddit before it) appears to have a problem with overly-aggressive bannings for perceived slights. In the topic linked above there were people permanently banning users from multiple communities (any they moderate - dozens in some cases) for single downvotes, 4 downvotes across a ten-month period, and bannings because a moderator thought they maybe sorta kinda read that a user may have had a negative thought about their pet issue.

I've personally been banned from Communities (and been sent some pretty vile PMs) for posting in our weekly threads here playing devil's advocate where I state hard questions that I do not necessarily feel are correct. They think they've discovered some secret agenda by finding posts I've made here and use them as "receipts" in order to dismiss anything they think they're reading that may be contrary to their opinion. Any context provided for the post falls on deaf ears.

I'm someone who operates on the idea of "If you can not defend an opinion from scrutiny, you should probably not hold that opinion."

To quote myself:

It’s pretty tragic that people can't handle opposing opinions. I think the activist nature of Lemmy is kind of a self-destructive spiral and people need to learn how to live with each other again. But I guess that’s the issue with modern social media as a whole… Nobody has any idea how to convince anyone else, only to yell at them louder.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Are niche Communities correct for banning anyone who downvotes?
  • Do downvotes represent a "disagree" button for you (this Community notwithstanding)?
  • Most importantly, what would it take to change this?
  • Does it help build the Community? What about the platform as a whole?
  • Is there a way to build a "safe space" without building an echo chamber online? Is that even a valuable thing to build?
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Better discovery of related communities, including everything from cross-endorsement from mods, to public user lists of communities, to lemmy instance admin recommended communities (kinda like old reddit default subs, per instance), to fediverse reputation mechanisms, etc.

Also better UX, like lemmy clients with "multireddit" style browsing support.

When interacting with individual lemmy communities, we need better introductions and exposure to rules and guidelines while posting.

Individual communities and instances should be able to run themselves however they want. The lemmy network will be healthiest when people know what to expect and where to find what they want. And if you don't find a place, it should be easier to create and advertise it.

And lastly: community coaching where experienced mods teach new ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Idk I check the modlogs off phtn i think ocasionally, I feel like if it was that easy to get banned here my other accounts and this one would be banned from somewhere

[–] SharpIntroduction75@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have thought about building my own platform as well. I joined lemmy thinking that it would be different but if it's going to be the same b******* then what is the point? I do believe a platform can exist where people don't have the same opinion on everything. But it's also important to define what a troll is. There's nothing wrong with downvoting. It just shows that people disagree with what someone has said. I also believe that there should be a third button where people can vote that someone is a troll. This is the button that should be used by moderators to review a user's account if they have a certain number of troll votes. I believe in freedom of speech but I also believe that one person's freedom ends where another person's freedom begins. Nobody has the freedom to violate another person's freedom. Threats and harassment should not be tolerated and should not be considered freedom of speech. Inciting violence is not freedom of speech. Spreading propaganda and targeting people who would otherwise not seek out this propaganda is not freedom of speech. The use of technology to manipulate information is not freedom of speech. Hate speech is not free speech. It's very easy to define what should be acceptable and what should be banned. The problem is that greed controls everything and that is why we cannot have nice things.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Giving users a quick-access "this is a troll" button would be rapidly abused.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›