this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
724 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

17244 readers
791 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Real leaders don't need to be paranoid about what their underlings think about them. Fascism is more fragile than it appears.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“[Their] need for control is so desperate because it is so unnatural. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear.”

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fear and greed. Who is that quote by? It's great.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Believe it or not, it’s from the Star Wars tv series “Andor” of all places. That show was really too good for its source material.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Real leaders would take the time to understand why someone doesn’t like them, do a little self reflection to see if it’s either a valid point or just a perception issue, and then work to fix the issue if there is one. If it’s just a person who just doesn’t like them but is good at their job, just ignore it. If they are truly not a good fit or just a bad actor who just thrives in negativity, then you either find a better fit for them or then you fire them.

I’m very much a pleaser type personality but if someone doesn’t like me for whatever reason, I don’t really sweat it if it doesn’t affect me personally. Most people like me but not everyone and that’s ok. This constant need to be surrounded by yes men and sycophants is just disturbing.

[–] t_berium@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

True. And real leaders don't want to lead.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't FBI agents be able to pass a "lie detector" test? Has anyone told Kash they aren't actual lie detectors?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Polygraphs have always been close to useless even for normal people. Anyone being interrogated isnyoing to be nervous and likely set them off.

However, you have to be slighlty, remotely intelligent to understand that nuance. And that is not an affliction any Trump cabinet appointee has.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago

Polygraphs provide authoritarians the excuse to get rid of people.

The same way that scientology uses auditing. The point is to instil fear and doubt into whomever you're measuring so that you can manipulate them.

So, they are extremely useful.

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Damn dude that's some serious trump energy

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol. I've lied during lie detector tests and still passed.

Hoping our FBI officials are capable of doing the same.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It'd be funnier if they passed while being as sarcastic as possible just to mess with him

[–] AAA@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

I like to imagine that anyone who works at the FBI, and has the opportunity, would try lying at the polygraph for fun.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Of course, "lie detectors" are bunk.

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why do none of these clowns know polygraphs don't work

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Comparing them to clowns is an insult to clowns.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 1 week ago

🤡 We demand to be taken seriously.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Because of a general sense in the population that they do work. It's kind of a myth of super competence.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

He could also use a plethysmograph to see which male staff likes him.

NB: Polygraphs are a hilarious pseudo-science just slightly above palm reading and astrology.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Dudes a meth head

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

A more accurate testing would be to hold his portrait and look for visible signs of disgust

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'm short, but my cock is huge! Compared to my pinky 😩

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

These LIARS are being mean about me!

- Joseph Stalin

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Once again, this isn’t a nottheonion because it’s completely plausible when I read the headline. I think this onion concept may by dead because real life is so fucking dumb

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

For those wishing to get past the soft paywall

https://archive.ph/1xgSG

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›