this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycling

2805 readers
89 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The City of London is the one square mile in the centre that consists mostly of office space, at a fairly high density, and not the entirety of London. Bicycles outnumbering cars there is just common sense, and shouldn’t be remotely controversial. (Parking there would probably be a massive headache, for one.)

With other boroughs of London, it’s a lot more varied. Westminster and Chelsea, for one, is very different, with its council vetoing bike lanes the Greater London council planned to run through it, as its wealthy residents don’t want them taking road space away from their Land Rovers and Porsche Taycans or bringing the wrong kinds of people through their neighbourhoods.

[–] calamitycastle@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Appreciate this is the cycling community already but even if you expand the definition of city of London to mean the full inner city (zone 1, say) it should still not be controversial for bikes to outnumber cars.

The point here is that the City of London has put in some pretty serious bike infrastructure which they started since the pandemic. It's not all perfect but it's better than it was, especially the junction around bank station, which was an accident hotspot for years

[–] hallettj@leminal.space 4 points 3 days ago

I was keeping in mind the same caveat, that City of London ≠ Greater London. But still, cycling is up by a huge amount, and car traffic is down. So what they're doing is working! It's another example to point to to show that if you build cycling infrastructure people will use it.

The video also spends a lot of time looking at ridership increases in Hackney. It's another small part of Greater London (although much larger than City of London), but it's more progress, and shows off strategies that are working in residential areas. It looks like Hackney has encouraged cycling by creating "low traffic neighborhoods", where they use traffic filters to close residential streets to through-traffic.

Sometimes you hear arguments against large investments in bike infrastructure along the lines of, "Biking works for Holland, but we don't have a bike culture here." Examples of cycling trending up in more places helps to make the case for infrastructure elsewhere.

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My dream for San Francisco. Will probably have to wait for all the nimbys to die first though

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago

My dream for the world.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

The O in London. Beautiful.