51
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChronoPixel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't this breach multiple EU privacy laws?

[-] Figaro2x@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are exceptions for law enforcement/intelligence in GDPR. Those are particularly broad in the UK data protection act for example.

[-] Awthatsnotright@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is what I'm wondering.

[-] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think it does, as the GDPR does not protect 'criminals' or against the police using your data.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

~~LIberté~~, ~~Egalité~~, ~~Fraternité~~.

[-] DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

How to make your country burn faster 101

[-] hebiyoujo@tucson.social 4 points 1 year ago

I see this going very poorly very quickly. I don't know how much longer we're going to have a France after this, but I'm interested in seeing how this unfolds.

Do they like, want the protests to continue on our something? They can't be that stupid.

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

The protests are for police brutality against Minorities. Apparently the shot 17 years old kid was repeatedly hit with back of the gun which made him moves his leg away from the breaks and since it's an automatic the car started moving forward...the rest is history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SoulKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Privacy and anonymity is illusion.

[-] lokitkhemak@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

This will definitely not be misused by anyone in the government. How on the earth did such blatantly dystopian law get passed?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

At least it's happening out in the open? Other states do this without parlimentary or congressional approval.

[-] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Interestingly enough I went to a lecture by a Chinese lawmaker yesterday who said the exact same thing. When it's codified in law, you know what they can and can't do, and what they can and can't use in court against you. When governments just do it covertly and subvert due process, your right to privacy suffers a lot more. She didn't have to point out what Snowden uncovered about the NSA for everyone to know what she was referring to.

[-] ShotLine@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

A little confused. Regardless of whats legal we know what they 'can' do, just not whether its legal or not. What we lose by legalising it is precisely that it can be used in court as legitimate evidence.

Currently in the US everyone knows they have far less privacy from the government, or from corporations for that matter, but ill gotten info cant easily be uses in court.

IMO the really scary thing is that now the government is just buying info from data brokers where the users technically consented in some app's TOS then using that. Its legally cleaner, and honestly probably better than info they could've gotten from from shadier methods.

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

French police about to see a whole lotta dick pics.

[-] Dr_Toofing@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

The article does not mention, how will this be achieved technology wise? I don't know of any universal way that a government might activate these features on a person's phone. Unless network operators/phone manufacturers start installing backdoors. This does not bode well.

[-] Pili@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm wondering the same. Hopefully privacy oriented projects such as GrapheneOS can counter whatever technology they will try to implement.

[-] Jongaros@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Patriot act requires them to do so. I am gonna guess they probably will unless they want to go to federal prison.

[-] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Jokes on them. Run Linux phone, Android apps become useless. The PinePhones have the modem as an isolated module from the rest of the phone, connected via USB, so the modem can't do anything too invasive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It’s almost like Macron wants to be decapitated.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

... wtf is going on over there... What kind of douchebags did you guys elect? I mean, I'm American, I know I can't throw stones here, but y'alls were better than that. You like, wisely stood against our 9/11 invasion and we probably should've listened.

But, wtf?

btw, if anyone was too lazy to dig, this publication is a nigerian newspaper that actually seems legit. Founded in 2020, so pretty new still. Looking at their front page they mostly just do local reporting. Has had run-ins with local power.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We elected him as the "last rempart to the extreme right". Turns out he and his cronies are corrupted authoritarian fucks. Their shit social and economic policies are opening a highway to the actual far right in the near future, most likely 2027.

[-] baked_tea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago

More like shitty electoral system that facilitates the choice of a lesser evil instead of the choice for the best candidate.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the United States.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They have proportional representation and a ton of parties. It's a completely different kind of suck. Although I guess they also are presidential.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, I’m American, I know I can’t throw stones here

Right? I'm wary of chastising any first world country at the moment. The past 7 years in particular have been especially WTF

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You know that America just... does this, right? No bill, no law... In fact it was the first to do this at all. It's why in crime shows they remove the battery (from phone where you still can, of course.)

It is not legal for police to spy on citizens via their phone cameras in the US…

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Police, no. Homeland security? crickets

[-] Pips@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago

Still no. Do they do it anyway? Probably, but that doesn't make it legal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, the "Patriot" Act did authorize stuff like this in the US. There was also the "Freedom" Act, and generally this is all FISA stuff that has very low standards for what's allowed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Miczech@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Is this a legitimate source of news?

[-] drahardja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It’s based on a syndicated news release from Agence France Presse. Here’s a direct transcription of the article from AFP: https://www.barrons.com/news/france-set-to-allow-police-to-spy-through-phones-b21f1f21

[-] downpunxx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

that'd be the point I'd forgo smartphones entirely

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
51 points (94.7% liked)

World News

32285 readers
781 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS