For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
What would that wheat field grow, like two loaves of bread?
Quick maffs, 1 acre can produce 2.3 tons of wheat per growing year. The image looks like about one-sixteenth of the acre is dedicated to grain. That divides out to 140 kg of wheat per year. Maybe you lose 10% of the mass from suboptimal grinding to flour, that's 126 kg of flour per year. 400g of flour per loaf of bread means you could make 315 loaves from 1/16 of a square acre.
Maybe you divide that by half just because of labor constraints, lack of proper industrial ewuipment, and no economy of scale.
I mean thats still a hell of a lot actually? Not sure what your points are here but i go through a loaf of bread in a week, sometimes two if i havent eaten a lot and stick it in the fridge for toast. So even if you have a family of 4 (or 6) thats still plenty? Obviously a lot of labor involved but in terms of growing capacity it seems plentiful.
I proved myself wrong by thinking about it, that's why theres no consistent thesis.
