this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
88 points (89.3% liked)

Canada

10004 readers
762 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

When was this from, and what did he mean by that exactly? The context matters.

He's been way harder on Israel than Trudeau ever was.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

“A Zionist (if you will) Palestinian State that recognizes the right of Israel to exist. Not just to exist but to prosper and not live in fear.”

So he just means a state that doesn't want to wipe Israel off the map. He may not be aware that "Zionist" is a trigger word in far left information bubbles.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

The clip is linked. He's talking about wanting a Palestinian state that's pro Israel and pro Israeli flourishing.

I guess he means a state that's ok with illegal settlements and apartheid treatment.

Maybe he means one that'll back up Israel's imperialist and aggressive wars in the region.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (13 children)

I guess he means a state that’s ok with illegal settlements and apartheid treatment.

Why would he mean that?

I think it's more likely that he's idealizing a future where Israel and Palestine forget their history and trauma and suddenly become best buddies who root for each other's success because no one is interested in inflicting any more pain on the other. This is a pointless exercise in imagination but it's probably what he's going for with this statement.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Very charitable but valid interpretation.

Extremely poor choice of a loaded word if so.

Either way, reason to be disappointed with him.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Extremely poor choice of a loaded word if so.

Totally agree. And tone deaf too. I imagine how ridiculous would it be to call for an "American exceptionalist" Canada.

Very braindead to hope for a future empathetic view of the agressor if the aggression hasn't even stopped yet.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 4 points 18 hours ago

Good comparison.

I believe in an independent Canadian state but it must be a MAGA state!

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It was pointless to imagine France and England would ever put aside their differences... until they did. It was pointless to imagine France and Germany putting aside their differences... until they did. I remember when I was young people said The Troubles would never end. I was told the war in Yugoslavia would go on forever.

People can put aside their differences. There is a Palestinian movement in Gaza that wants peace. Israel in the past has tried to make land for peace deals, but guys like Yasser Arafat fucked it up.

There is a willingness for peace on both sides, it's just the leadership needs to change.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

You might be reading too much into what I wrote. Saying it’s a pointless discourse is not the same as saying that I believe a peaceful resolution is forever impossible.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The clip is linked, and you went ahead and made up a bunch of shit anyway.

What he actually said was "A Zionist... if you will... Palestinian State that recognizes the right of Israel to exist. Not just to exist but to prosper and not live in fear."

Understand the the word "Zionist" is only a trigger word in leftist bubble world. You've been conditioned to think Zionist = evil demon Jew, but in normal circles it doesn't mean that.

Why are you against there being a Palestinian state that peacefully co-exists?

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A peaceful Israel needs to exist before any moral nation can tolerate it. The one we have is one that expands illegal settlements in Palestinian territory and starts wars of aggression and imperial expansion throughout the region.

No, I don't want that Israel to prosper, I want it to understand fear.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Violence isn't working out well for Palestinians. Maybe it's time to start accepting Israel is going to continue to exist, trying to make it not exist is just getting a lot of people killed.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 21 hours ago

Hey zionists. You can chortle my balls.

load more comments
view more: next ›