this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
1526 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

9368 readers
2908 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Keep pissing into the wind, Bernie.

[–] Hlodwig@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And people really think congress wouldnt vote for war? Lol...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 3 months ago

oh hey so this is actually correct

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Will there be a January 7 at the White House ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Even if we ignore the fact that he can easily coax our useless congress into agreeing, the entire government has done nothing but dance around this requirement ever since the end of WWII. You won't see a congressional declaration of war unless its literally WWIII.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but nobody has given a shit about that since like... Korea?

[–] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 months ago

You’re right Bernie! But how are you, I, or anyone else going to stop him? I mean, somebody’s gotta do it…

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

uhhh ok sure but that doesn't mean loopholes exist

and like loopholes the founders knew abt, like its by design that the POTUS moves the military arround

to say that this is illegal isnt sensible, you might be against it but still

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

We haven't followed that law in so long though

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

As soon as I see who wrote it, my mind reads it as "cleah."

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I think most of those congressional powers have been eroded for a very long time.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Taco’s a bitch, he’s leaking all this to get leverage to make a deal. He’ll pussy out and Iran knows it. They’re playing the same games with him but from a position of knowing he’s full of shit

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

In the case of war on Iran, Trump successfully ended it, or ended so far. Congress as part of the zionist first rule over America would definitely have authorized it, and may have been behind "discrediting the success" report leaks, in order to extend the war. Israel did fail to provide immunity from war crime repercussions, and so likely happy, at citizen level, with ceasefire. But congress is no threat to zionist supremacy, and a debate procedure, just legitimizes the illusion of non tyranny.

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

2/3 of Congress is owned by AIPAC so it wouldn't make a difference anyway.

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, we're waiting, any day now, determine away you useless feckless fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›