this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
919 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

72484 readers
3131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My company gets a lot of incoming chats from customers (and potential customers)

The challenge of this side of the business is 98% of the questions asked over chat are already answered on the very website that person started the chat from. Like it's all written right there!

So real human chat agents are reduced to copy paste monkeys in most interactions.

But here's the rub. The people asking the questions fit into one of two groups: not smart or patient enough to read (unfortunate waste of our resources) or they are checking whether our business has real humans and is responsive before they buy.

It's that latter group for whom we must keep red blooded, educated and service minded humans on the job to respond, and this is where small companies can really kick ass next to behemoths like google who bring in over $1m per employee but still can't seem to afford a phone line to support your account with them.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I always found it weird how chatbots were basically a less efficient and less reliable way to access data that's already on the website but all the companies were racing to get one. People kept telling me that I'm in the minority in being able to find information on a webpage, but I suspect the sort of people who are too dumb to do that aren't going to have much better luck dealing with the quirks and eccentricies of a chatbot either.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Most of the time when I talk to a chat bot it's because I need to contact support for an issue only support can help me with, but unfortunately the company in question is Id.me and they apparently don't have support of any kind and all these tickets I've been writing have been going into a paper shredder

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago

how many bags of popcorn can we eat before the other half panic, pivot hard or go out of business?

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

But but but, Daddy CEO said that RTO combined with Gen AI would mean continued, infinite growth and that we would all prosper, whether corposerf or customer!

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

…and the other half insists on learning the hard way.

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 9 points 3 weeks ago

The other half is too deep in the shit and too proud to admit they are wrong

[–] Keener@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

As someone who works in customer support, I support this. Fuck ai.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I will note that AI customer service could be an improvement. Customer service helpline jobs are one of the worst jobs to get paid peanuts to do.

Of course, my preference is to upgrade the crap voice recognition system with an AI voice recognition system, which is way better at understanding words. The help desk jockeys can stay, as they do the real work.

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it could be, but these guys aren't looking to replace human workers with a robust, well-trained, and properly-deployed AI, they're looking to slash and burn their labor costs with whatever they think will squeak by.

I've used Amazon's AI live chat bots a fair bit over the years and I have to say they're actually pretty good. 90% of the time they can resolve the issue themselves (at least in my experience) and faster than it would take to connect to a person. But most people don't have Amazon's budget or customer service-oriented business model.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Theyll use it as an excuse to say they cant find workers now because of ai and need to oursouce to a cheaper country

[–] elevenbones@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thank fucking god

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

that is to say they did it and its not working.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

the other half also replaced business analyst with AI

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Good. AI models don't have mouths to feed at home, people do.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Point and laugh, everyone.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

If the customer support of my ISP doesn't even know what CGNAT is, but AI knows, I am actually troubled whether this is a good move or not.

[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

Try asking for a level 2 support tech. They'll normally pass your call to someone competent without any fuss.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

AGI will destroy us before replacing us

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›