News

37400 readers

2887 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

164

EFF to Court: Young People Have First Amendment Rights (www.eff.org)

submitted 10 months ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/news@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Utah cannot stifle young people’s First Amendment rights to use social media to speak about politics, create art, discuss religion, or to hear from other users discussing those topics, EFF argued in a brief filed this week.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This feels distinctly like one of those turning point moments in society becoming full blown idiocracy.

Anyone with half a brain can tell that social media is wrecking an entire generation of kids. The violence and vandalism it has incited in schools. Kids committing literal crimes and filming themselves doing it for clout. Social media is bad enough for people with a developed brain.

“Freedom of speech” is such a stupid argument here. I have freedom of speech, but that doesnt mean my rights are being violated if I dont get to voice my freedom of speech in a women’s bathroom. Banning kids wholesale from social media sites is not a violation of free speech unless you want to argue that they should also be allowed in bars, dispensaries, strip clubs, or on casino floors.

Go back like 100 years ago and it was normal for children to smoke, or drink beer, which is unthinkable now. Cigars were prizes at fairs for children, just like adults. Thats where “close, but no cigar” comes from.

Im sure that when people wanted to begin putting age limits on alcohol or tobacco there were plenty of people up in arms about “freedom” because they didnt want their most susceptible market taken away from them. This is literally no different to me. The government has a plenty compelling interest in protecting children by forcing them to wait until a reasonable age to engage with social media. Just like a beer or a smoke

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I think websites should just be held more accountable.

I don't think wholesale banning children from the internet is a good idea. I remember being a child online in the distant past and it being cool, it's be a shame if I couldn't have thst experience. Though I know the web has changed.