Memes

10134 readers

1381 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.

Wait at least 2 months before reposting
No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca can be better place for that
Use NSFW marking accordingly

Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz

seahorse@midwest.social

graphito@sopuli.xyz

303

How sad for you (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 day ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/memes@sopuli.xyz

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

True story.

This is back in the 1960s. A Texas bank is putting up a new building and sets up a temporary office in a trailer. There's a one ton safe in the trailer. A crook figures that a dozen strong guys would have no problem lifting the safe by hand and carrying it out. He puts together a team and they do the job. Something goes wrong and they end up dropping the safe. One crook's finger is caught under the safe. He manages to get away, but when the police lift the safe they find his finger tip. And yes, they had his fingerprints on file.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fingerprint matching in the 60s sounds, uh, time intensive.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

If you want to go down a rabbithole, look up the early days of J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI.

Hoover got the job because he was a bureaucrat, not a lawman. He would have his people build giant files by hand on anyone of interest.

[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fingered by the law

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Doesn't matter, got fingered

[–] xylol@leminal.space 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Finger print matching doesn't really work well its all just a guess with no universal criteria on how close a smudge has to be to your fingerprint to be used

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It can be used more empirically. The more matching points, the less likely a given match is down to random luck. A smudge will have relatively few useful points, and so far less reliability.

The big problem is you can either use fingerprints to identify someone to a scene, or to search for a match in a database. 1 in a million sounds impressive to a jury, and is in a 1 to 1 test. Compare it to a database of 10 million, and you will expect to get 10 matches by random chance alone.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

There's also no evidence to suggest that fingerprints are truly unique at all.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

And that's how we started on the road to a surveillance state

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I love the spelling mistake to convey the real message.