this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
135 points (97.9% liked)

Firefox

19599 readers
113 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 9 points 17 hours ago

Strange how so many, are so quick to anger towards Firefox. I have used it since Navigator, and I've always felt quite safe with it. I am in awe of a browser that not only competes, but also surpasses other browsers with a ton more money behind it.

[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, it's incredibly good.

If Firefox is trying to get more developers on board with working on it than being on the largest development platform helps them.

It's a move that should benefit Firefox by making open source contributions more accessible And bringing in more developers.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

so they're getting rid of mercurial and self hosting? not sure if this is positive..

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago

It is still an improvement as this makes it easier to bring in more people.

With that being said, I think it would've been better to use Forgejo.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Generally thats concerning.

But hopefully this means its easier to find and submit bug reports. Their issue tracker beforewm was a terrible UX.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Not only that, it's easier to contribute. And generally more accessible to more developers. Which is a damn good thing.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Real question, why downgrade to a proprietary host?

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My guess is they're preparing for the Google search money to vanish and cutting costs wherever they can however small and hosting their own code repo was one thing to go.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Hosting the code is probably non-material as far as costs go for Mozilla, and I doubt they would ever recoup the costs of migrating the code off their current solution in terms of engineering costs.

If I had to guess, this is them meeting other Open Source contributors where they usually are, which in large part is GitHub these days.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

If I had to guess, this is them meeting other Open Source contributors where they usually are, which in large part is GitHub these days.

Out of 28 projects whose release note RSS-feed I subscribe to, 25 of them are hosted on GitHub. While I'd love to see more of these projects move away from GitHub, it is understandable that they go where the largest amount of devs are. I'd love to see more of them start mirroring their repositories to Codeberg or their own Forgejo instance though, to give developers the opportunity to contribute while not alienating the devs who stay on GitHub. At least that would lessen the loss of opportunities for the devs when ditching GitHub - but I am not sure whether it is trivial or a hassle to maintain that kind of setup.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 11 points 23 hours ago

That would seem a bit extreme, I was thinking more that they want to lower the barrier to contributions, but who knows, it could be. Both would positively affect the economical aspect of things after all

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn’t they move to Microsoft for hosting quite some time ago?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

they only had this mirror

https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/

but it seems they were using mercurial at https://hg-edge.mozilla.org/

[–] Termight@lemmy.ml -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

And this is how you make a meme, fellow kids!