sans justice to isntreal crimes, they justify perfectly well them actually, it's why porkies had to accept constrains of the law in the first place.
this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
490 readers
449 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
All liberation movements should simply focus group test their actions to maximize the thing that matters most in the end, American public opinion
You should just let fascists kill you and everyone you love, actually
This mf skeeves me out so bad
so cool to see libs think they're taking the moral high ground by both-sidesing genocide because the victims aren't completely passive
Friendly reminder that this guy's dad is a defense contractor.
Of course they are
Well, the message here seems to be "both sides bad" which always favors the powerful, who in this case buy American, so that's consistent
Israel's crimes do not justify Hamas's crimes
True, but this applies to literally any X and Y groups
Killing civilians hurts your cause in public eye
No shit sherlock
That's why public opinion went 10 points toward Israel after October 10
Lmao no. It's cause Israel had/has the media infrastructure advantage
Notice how his first 2 statements are "ethics 101", completely unobjectionable statements where you are supposed to "fill in the gaps" with the crimes you believe Hamas committed, rather than being an actual claim from this guy about something he thinks was a crime (and he could be challenged on?)
A common lib interpretation of the media is that it is "free" and people are always fully and accurately informed by the media, if they aren't, it is a personal choice, rather than the media being designed to manipulate people.
And of course, libs love stating vague implications as if they were facts, while refusing to ever commit to an actual idea or statement (otherwise they would be challenged on it, like you said)
Israhell went from universal support and both sideism at worst (outside a minority in the west) to full on “jup thats a nazi state”
7th October set the foundation of its destruction.
Occupied people have the right to self defense. Occupiers do not.
Remember the three arrows