this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Business

737 readers
91 users here now

A place to share business news and insights.


Rules


  1. Follow lemmy.world rules
  2. Only post content related to business
  3. Do not use this community to promote your business

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NEW YORK, May 7 (Reuters) - UnitedHealth Group (UNH.N) , opens new tab was sued on Wednesday for allegedly concealing how backlash from the killing of a top executive was damaging its business, causing its stock to nosedive after the insurer lowered its 2025 outlook.

In a proposed class action filed in Manhattan federal court, shareholders said the insurer defrauded them after the December 4 shooting of UnitedHealthcare Chief Executive Brian Thompson by shifting away from strategies that led to higher-than-average claims denials, without revealing the impact on profitability.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

This is the actual reason why it is capitalism and not any individual players that must be ultimately held at fault. Even if every company from now on acted in the best interests of humanity/ workers, they'd be sued for failing to produce the amount of profits required by shareholders. They literally have to act like unrepentant sociopaths for them to stay in business.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

without revealing the impact on profitability

I think this is the real issue. Perhaps they lied about expected profitability going forward, and that's a big no-no for publicly traded companies.

Shareholders said UnitedHealth had previously inflated its stock price by recklessly sticking with its old forecast, even as mounting public anger and an October 17 U.S. Senate report, opens new tab on claims denials caused it to become more patient-friendly.

The suit isn't that they didn't stick to their old strategy, but that they presented false forecasts about what impact the change would have.

[–] Grimtuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly. Their continued investment was based on them killing as many customers as possible. They lied about the financial impact and would have divested if they realised saving people's lives wasn't going to make them as much money.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Well if it worked for the executive class maybe it will work for the shareholder class too.