I've been calling it threadiverse because that is what I saw most other people call it.
Really all it is is "ActivityPub groups" or if that is too technical, "fediverse groups".
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
I've been calling it threadiverse because that is what I saw most other people call it.
Really all it is is "ActivityPub groups" or if that is too technical, "fediverse groups".
The linked linkers, because we're link aggregators that link together.
I've always liked threadiverse, since it describes what's unique about this aspect of the Fediverse.
Oh shit my vote made 100%, I didnโt know I was the first to vote.
The Verse it is then ๐
Le Verse in my corner of the world.
Maybe we are poetic!? :-P
I need ad-like branding on what Mbin and PieFed are.
Im too lazy to look it up
Lembipie. What else?
(And why does this particular subset need a name, anyway? The plus combo is easier to get the point across with)
I've been calling them "Redditlikes" or "Reddit replacements" in ordinary conversation. We won't need terms like that forever, though.
I mean, yeah it'll be better to have a term in which Reddit plays no part in defining is!
And this post is an opportunity to make exactly such a term!
Say "fuck spez" in the absolute best way possible - by moving on and forget that he ever existed, as we build our own stuff here.:-D
aggriverse
Is that bc of this being a post aggregation? Then wouldn't it be an "aggreverse"?
fedeverse?
What about "Fedivotes" or "Votiverse?" Upvotes and downvotes are pretty key distinctives to this form of social network.
I think, the "threadiverse" is more akin to the old (also federated, just in a different way) Usenet / Newsgroups than web-forums. So "ScoopGroups", maybe?