There used to be paper encyclopedias of food. They were called something like.. cookbook or something. Joking aside, i thought it would be nice to have a wikibook cookbook, so i went to check. And there is.
Try Allrecipes.com. No fluff, just recipes.
Based.cooking
I love the overall premise of the site - no fuzz, no bloat, no SEO.
However I'd be a bit careful with the recipes listed there - some (like galinha caipira*) are clearly intended as a simple base to edit to your tastes, while some (as that aglio e olio) are clearly derivative already, without saying "this is optional, not part of the base dish, but recommended". And what's up with tapioca starch in their omelet recipe???
*note: contrariwise to what the site implies, galinha caipira is not a dish. It refers to the raising conditions of the bird - free range, in a small property, pecking some bugs, rolling on dirt, chasing your cat off, etc. It's basically the opposite of "industrially raised" chicken, it's generally more flavourful but tougher. It's great for braising, but the site seems to conflate braised meats with stews.
The problem with community-edited cookbooks is that you end up with multiple recipes for the same dish. I just searched for hummus on such a site and got 246 results. It has become useless over the years.
I use paprika 3 to extract and save recipes - works well enough that I eventually sprang for the paid version
+1 for paprika. Works like a charm. Other great features too. I have all my recipes with all of my personal tweaks/notes from the past 10 years in there. Also, all of my 'special occasion' meal planning goes through there.
I'm probably old-school, but you may also find you get some good use out of cookbooks if you find good/reliable ones. They're also kind of fun to browse/explore once you have faith in the source.
A few I'd recommend: The Food Lab America's Test Kitchen Good Eats
If there's a cuisine you favor you, you might try finding a commonly recommended book or author in that area.
I haven't seen that one. I'll check it out!
I have used Recipe keeper for years myself.
The main features I like are the ways to import recipes (web, photos and text) I can take a picture of a handwritten recipe and it will magically recreate it. It also has an app for windows, so laptops/tablets and my android phone all sync up. You can make your own cookbooks too.
How good is Recipe keeper with handwriting that is hard to read? And can it do more languages than English?
Taken a nice photo of your creation? We highly encourage sharing with our friends over at !foodporn@lemmy.world.
Posts in this community must be food/cooking related and must have one of the "tags" below in the title.
We would like the use and number of tags to grow organically. For now, feel free to use a tag that isn't listed if you think it makes sense to do so. We are encouraging using tags to help organize and make browsing easier. As time goes on and users get used to tagging, we may be more strict but for now please use your best judgement. We will ask you to add a tag if you forget and we reserve the right to remove posts that aren't tagged after a time.
[QUESTION] What are your favorite spices to use in soups?
!bbq@lemmy.world - Lemmy.world's home for BBQ.
!foodporn@lemmy.world - Showcasing your best culinary creations.
!sousvide@lemmy.world - All things sous vide precision cooking.
!koreanfood@lemmy.world - Celebrating Korean cuisine!
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.