162
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 77 points 11 months ago

Don't listen to this bullshit. I hear higher ups like this talk all the fuckin time about how we're "on the brink of war" but nothing happens. They're just constantly edging themselves at the thought of us going up against another adversary.

[-] Poayjay@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Exactly. Hell, even suggesting direct involvement in another unwinable middle eastern war would be political suicide. Of course someone who’s entire profession is war is all about war.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

By putting a fleet off the shore of Isreal we prevent Syria and Egypt from getting involved.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 25 points 11 months ago

Egypt is generally a pretty cooperative partner with Israel and the US.

After all, Gaza has a border with Egypt that the Egyptian military also blockades, though of course no one likes to talk about that detail very much.

[-] nyoooom@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Yes I was very surprised and confused as to why Gaza would be stuck if they could just trade easily through Egypt, now it makes more sense, they're just fucked.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

That's the thing. For as much nominal support the Arab world gives Palestine, there is absolutely nothing preventing Jordan and Egypt from welcoming in Palestinians.

Except that Palestinian militants conducted an attempted coup against Jordan in 1970, and Hamas routinely conducts terrorist attacks throughout the Sinai peninsula, so neither country actually wants to deal with them.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

For decades, Arab countries played up the "plight of the Palestinians" not because they cared about those people, but because it distracted those countries' citizens. It gave them an external enemy to hate (Israel) instead of asking questions about their own governments' actions.

Jordon could have easily absorbed the Palestinians into their general population, but doing so would have removed a political pawn that Jordon could use against Israel. It was better for Jordon if the Palestinians were poor refugees living in squalor so that they could keep saying "look at what Israel did."

NOTE: I'm not absolving Israel for any of its actions. I'm just adding to the discussion by pointing out that the Arab nations only cared about the Palestinians to advance their own goals. The second their goals didn't align with the Palestinians' well-being, they were happy to let the Palestinians suffer and die.

[-] Simpsonator@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Are you suggesting that Jordan and Egypt don't care about Palestinians because they don't allow Israel to forcibly relocate millions of refugees to their countries? Beyond the fact it's a war crime, it doesn't really improve the situation for anyone but Israel.

[-] kbotc@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

The Gaza Strip literally was Egyptian territory. Hamas is a branch of the Egyptian Islamic Brotherhood. The Apartheid state as it exists is largely the fault of the two major attempts by neighboring countries to exterminate Israel and failing.

Egypt should care about the humanitarian crisis as it played a major part in starting it.

[-] Simpsonator@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I agree with the second part of your statement. Egypt could do more. But I'm not understanding what the first part has to do with forced displacement to Egypt. Is that somehow justified by the history?

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 19 points 11 months ago

Egypt being involved is pretty remote.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

This looks like the final straw and the Palestinians will be kicked out of Israel for good. They likely will be relocated to Egypt.

[-] weedazz@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Lol 2 million people are not going to get relocated "for good"

[-] WagesOf@artemis.camp 3 points 11 months ago

Israel only exists because millions of Jews were relocated "for good."

[-] Smokeydabear94@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Willingly, which I think is an important caveat

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don't think they will be given the choice.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

Hamas are terrorist clowns and do not represent the Palestinian people. In fact, quite a few Palestinians hate Hamas. Israel knows this.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Except they have a very high approval rating and was one of the reasons they decided to attack again. Often their approval goes up after an operation as such.

https://apnews.com/article/hamas-middle-east-science-32095d8e1323fc1cad819c34da08fd87

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Israel knows. But doesn't care. The mere existence of Hamas will be used as justification for more brutality and collective punishment.

Because that's what Israel does. It's the reason why Hamas exists in the first place.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Isreal are oppressors no doubt. Hamas are terrorists which is also true. Around half of Israelis are Arab.

[-] curiousaur@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago

Eh, the US would really like an excuse to wipe Iran off the map before the get nukes.

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago

Yeah.. could we not? I want healthcare and cheaper groceries. Not to blow more people up.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's not zero sum. We can afford it all, the reason we don't have it is because of conservative lawmakers and the zombies who are convinced gov healthcare is commie socialism

Regarding not wanting to blow people up, yeah I get that.

But the funding isn't one or the other

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

What if the team with the wrong imaginary friend wins? Can you imaging how sad the losing imaginary friend would be?

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Its the same imaginary friend. Most people don't get that.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

You wish that was how it worked.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Let's say the US doesn't intervene. Would Israel use its nuclear weapons to defend itself?

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

At some point, unless it finds some other creative ways to murder large amounts of Palestinians

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You mean the nuclear weapons they tooooootally don't have?

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Everyone knows they have them.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

War country who builds war weapons and gives money to allies for them to buy war weapons suggests war will loom if their enemies threaten war.

And Im saying that as a American.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 20 points 11 months ago

If countries join Hamas, I'm sure that the US will take appropriate action. But, that is a big if. This is more of a warning.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Hamas has strong ties to Russia. This likely is a play to attempt to weaken US support for Ukraine in order to protect Israel.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Joke's on them. The US has enough bombs for everybody! Where do you think all of our healthcare money was going.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

We actually spend more money on Healthcare than the military.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It has been 0 years since the USA was involved in a war in the middle east.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

FUCK THIS FUCKING PLANET JFC

[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago

War fuels the US economy, MIC is practically salivating.

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Then they should throw more $ to the GOP than Putin is

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hard to compete with a kleptocracy on bribes. It's basically their whole deal

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Speaking on Sunday on MSNBC's "Weekends with Alex Witt," the four-star US Army general described how such an escalation likely would only occur if Israel's Middle Eastern neighbors became heavily involved.

Hamas militants launched a series of surprise attacks and rocket barrages against Israel on Saturday, killing hundreds and capturing dozens of hostages along the border of the Gaza Strip.

The US announced on Sunday that it is sending an aircraft carrier strike group, including F-35s and F-16s, to patrol the Eastern Mediterranean and deter all-out war involving Israel's neighbors.

"They're there for more than a show of force or a potential noncombatant evacuation," McCaffrey, who served in the Gulf War and led the US Southern Command from 1994 to 1996, told MSNBC.

Hezbollah, a militant group in Lebanon, said on Sunday that it had fired rockets into the Golan Heights, which Israel annexed from Syria in 1981.

Meanwhile, Egypt's Foreign Ministry on Saturday warned Israel of "grave consequences" and "serious repercussions" from escalating tensions with the Palestinians.


The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 168 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
162 points (88.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS