this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
782 points (97.8% liked)

memes

14349 readers
3397 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/17548675

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 230 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Making the welcome tour paid is completely baffling.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 104 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

they really want to make a new Wii Sports... but they fail to realise the difference between Wii Sports, Nintendo Land, 1 2 switch and Welcome Tour.

Wii Sports was a pack-in Game!

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 117 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wii Sports was a pack-in Game!

That's their problem: the biggest game on the console that everyone knows was given away for free.

Execs: "Do you know how much money we would have made if we sold Wii Sports to people!? We do that from now on!"

Gamers: "F that, I'm not paying full price for a tutorial!"

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Apparently the USA division head or whatever Reggie fought tooth and nail for wii sports to be an included free game. Nintendo Japan was very against the idea.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago

Nintendo Japan making gamer friendly decisions since nineteen ninety never

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'd say it paid off. Look whose remembered.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

The console wouldn't have sold as well without it. Wii Sports definitely contributed to the success of the console.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

I would love to really give 1,2 Switch a try, but I never will.

[–] cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And good... Nintendo Land sucked

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In my home, Nintendo Land is an all time great game. To this day, whenever my nieces visit, they demand to play Nintendo Land.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 96 points 2 weeks ago (39 children)

I'm still flabbergasted we've arrived at games costing 100€ now. Not some collector's edition, just the normal game. On a console that'll set you back 500€ on its own, not to mention the service subscriptions. Even the god damn next-gen improvements for existing games supported through backwards compat now cost a 2-digit sum. What's next, subscriptions for device features (which you already paid big money for) to work like it's a freaking BMW? It's just utter insanity, and people are still paying for all that shit.

[–] Kaiserschmarrn@feddit.org 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

oh boy, do I have news for you! The Nintendo Switch 2 has a C-Button on its controller which opens their new feature "Game Chat" for which a Nintendo Switch Online subscription is necessary. This means there is now a dedicated button on the controller, which will open a popup that tells you to buy their subscription!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Those backwards compat costs ain't optional either. Either payup (for each game) for super HD or don't play your existing games at all.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 15 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

There's a difference between switch 2 edition (upgraded versions) and original switch 1 versions. It can run both, you don't need the upgrade (unless you want the newer features).

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Do the switch 1 titles run in native (e.g. not upscaling) 1080p without paying more since that should just be a simple render change?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Games that ran at 1080p in docked mode should be able to do that on Switch 2, presumably the console could be smart enough to run the game at that resolution even in portable mode.

Otherwise, that definitely depends on the game engine and game programming. Not every game can handle arbitrary resolution changes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Almost all Switch games are natively compatible with the Switch 2. Stop spreading fake info, it does not help making whatever case you're trying to make.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For me, they're the same price they've always been 🏴‍☠️.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And on top of all that, patent trolling to hamstring any competition. I'm done encouraging their nonsense with my money.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 weeks ago

Remember their attempt at patenting relative motion? Absolutely absurd…

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could understand if it was a cutting edge powerhouse system. But it's apparently somewhere around PS4 Pro level hardware.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which is, to be fair, impressive for a highly mobile device. Kudos to those engineers. All that scummy fucking extortion shit still is fucked up though, no matter how you look at it. The only reason anyone buys this is because of the brand and its beloved exclusive franchises. In a more fair environment they'd be utterly demolished if they tried to pull of this bullshit, and the practice of preventing you to play your own older games to make you buy them over and over again (or hell, even not owning your games anymore) would be outright banned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's next, subscriptions for device features (which you already paid big money for) to work like it's a freaking BMW?

I mean, yes, they already announced that in the direct. The new GameChat built-in-discord thingy is only free until next March, at which point you'll need a subscription to continue using it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

They will keep doing it as long as people keep buying it.

Having a lot of fun on games that cost a tiny fraction of that. I think Isonzo is the most expensive I bought in the past few years and its £40, got it in 2022.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish Nintendo would catch up on Nintendo Lore. When is Link going to go relax with Zelda, only for Toadsworth to exit a pipe and ask if Link has heard of the Mushroom Initiative.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 18 points 2 weeks ago

We could call it Super Smash Bros. Avengers.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Nintendo is on the same level as HP for me. As in they will never get another cent from me.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

hewlett packard or harry potter?

[–] Vega@feddit.it 22 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 15 points 2 weeks ago
[–] jim3692@discuss.online 15 points 2 weeks ago

Horse Power

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

original gameplay supported by lore

i mean pretty dang close but i think there's a slight difference between injecting people with praying mantis DNA and praying mantises creating mantis society by themselves

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like two new testing opportunities. Get to it!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

1-2 Switch being a $60 game that didn't come with the Switch was just as bogus. And now they're doing it again.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"Will run on your machine"

If you have a PC. Otherwise, it requires special hardware, too.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Procedes to install Linux on [INSERT CONSOLE HERE].

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You have to go through a magical girl transformation first

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

You must be the pride of [SUBJECT HOMETOWN HERE]

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nOvA_NoVa@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

i REFUSE to pay 500 for the new switch, i don't even want to play any Nintendo games at this moment.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It sounds like you shouldn't buy the switch regardless of cost if you don't want to play any Nintendo games on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

its like they're trying to make PlayStation a monopoly, or is it all apart of the plan?

idk i guess

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

My switch is in the closet, so no. But, if I did currently play switch games, yeah.

I dislike the pricing, but I feel like it's probably fair. I like comparing $price/hr-entertainment vs. going to the movies. I think for most games, it will still be better value. But, I can understand using other metrics. A dropout.tv subscription is only 6.99/mo and there's at least a couple hours of new stuff being added to that each month, I think.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›