this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
1024 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

63009 readers
4251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dill@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tinfoil hat me goes straight to: make the population dumber and they’re easier to manipulate.

It’s insane how people take LLM output as gospel. It’s a TOOL just like every other piece of technology.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mostly use it for wordy things like filing out review forms HR make us do and writing templates for messages to customers

[–] dill@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. It’s great for that, as long as you know what you want it to say and can verify it.

The issue is people who don’t critically think about the data they get from it, who I assume are the same type to forward Facebook memes as fact.

It’s a larger problem, where convenience takes priority over actually learning and understanding something yourself.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As you mentioned tho, not really specific to LLMs at all

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

When it was new to me I tried ChatGPT out of curiosity, like with any tech, and I just kept getting really annoyed at the expansive bullshit it gave to the simplest of input. "Give me a list of 3 X" lead to fluff-filled paragraphs for each. The bastard children of a bad encyclopedia and the annoying kid in school.

I realized I was understanding it wrong, and it was supposed to be understood not as a useful tool, but as close to interacting with a human, pointless prose and all. That just made me more annoyed. It still blows my mind people say they use it when writing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago
[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I was talking to someone who does software development, and he described his experiments with AI for coding.

He said that he was able to use it successfully and come to a solution that was elegant and appropriate.

However, what he did not do was learn how to solve the problem, or indeed learn anything that would help him in future work.

[–] foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

how does he know that the solution is elegant and appropriate?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Weren't these assholes just gung-ho about forcing their shitty "AI" chatbots on us like ten minutes ago? Microsoft can go fuck itself right in the gates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Oddly enough that's exactly what corporate wants. Mindless drones to do their bidding unquestioned

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i use my thinking skills to tell the LLM to quit fucking up and try again or I'm gonna fire his ass

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

The only beneficial use I've had for "AI" (LLMs) has just been rewriting text, whether that be to re-explain a topic based on a source, or, for instance, sort and shorten/condense a list.

Everything other than that has been completely incorrect, unreadably long, context-lacking slop.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just try using AI for a complicated mechanical repair. For instance draining the radiator fluid in your specific model of car, chances are googles AI model will throw in steps that are either wrong, or unnecessary. If you turn off your brain while using AI, you're likely to make mistakes that will go unnoticed until the thing you did is business necessary. AI should be a tool like a straight edge, it has it's purpose and it's up to you the operator to make sure you got the edges squared(so to speak).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Garbage in, Garbage out. Ingesting all that internet blather didn't make the ai smarter by much if anything.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I‘m surprised they even published this finding given how hard they‘re pushing AI.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

That's because they're bragging, not warning.

Good thing most Americans already don't possess those!

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

never used it in any practical function. i tested it to see if it was realistic and i found it extremely wanting. as in, it sounded nothing like the prompts i gave it.

the absolutely galling and frightening part is that the tech companies think that this is the next big innovation they should be pursuing and have given up on innovating anyplace else. it was obvious to me when i saw that they all are pushing ai shit on me with everything from keyboards to search results. i only use voice commands to do simple things and it works just about half the time, and ai is built on the back of that which is why i really do not ever use voice commands for anything anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›