this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
116 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

68724 readers
3307 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

China's absolutely chock full of EVs. The Nordic countries are about to ban gas.

There's enough EVs out there right now that need the charging that with the rates go up they'll still exist.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, but this article is U.S. focused and highlighting the difficulties facing those companies specifically. It should really be titled to specify the U.S. charging industry.

There is huge international momentum behind electrification and the impact of Trump's policies will be to cede our technological competitiveness in both vehicles and charging to China.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My point is that charging is forging a head elsewhere in the world. Unless he figures out a way to make electric car charging illegal it will continue to surge here because there's already enough electric on the road to necessitate it.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See: trains

China and most European countries have high speed rail and well maintained networks.

USA has: one chonky boy pulling like 256 cars on a wonky track

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Love that analogy.

I do worry your '256 cars' is a little low.

Source: I overlook some tracks near America, which currently carries lots of untariffed American stuff.

[–] lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Nordic countries are about to ban gas.

No we are not. The 2025 100% ev target in norway was always a target, and there was never talks of a ban on ice. Were somewhere at around 95-100% new sales being evs but you can still buy ice and wont be prevented from doing so atleast in the forseeable future. Rest of the world just went on assuming that it was talk of a ban. Its not. Well probably follow suit with whatever eu is doing when it comes to actual bans.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Ah, I must have misunderstood when I read that Sweden was banning gas cars all together in Stockholm. Guess they're just ahead a bit.

[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, a lot of the time I'm in need of a super charger, there's a line to use it. The demand is there and it's not like EV owners can easily switch back to gas

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I suppose one could make some short term money by making an EV → Hybrid conversion kit....

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A nice, simple to fit combustion engine?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Yes. Great Scott! We shall mount it externally with wood screws and call it MrDifFusion but it's really just a cheap genny from Home Depot, Marty.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Edison motors in Canada is getting ready to put out conversion kits for pickup trucks to convert to series hybrid (onboard generator, all electric drivetrain). It's not for a short term profit, more for right to repair and a stance against planned obsolescence.

[–] Mondez 17 points 2 months ago

This feels like a tough one for betteridges law of headlines.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tesla I'm sure will do fine. I'm not sure about the others who don't have an in at the white house.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They have an in. A lot of them are already well established automotive companies who have a headstart on placement of bought politicians, and lobby groups. Tesla's just happens to be more readily visible just now.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 months ago

Just add a fake exhaust and something that makes a car noise and you'll have him fooled.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Fine, burn it to to ground rebuild it with a fucking mandatory charging and payment standard from the beginning.