this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
162 points (98.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44999 readers
914 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, Britain's national mapping organisation's brand is associated in our national consciousness with going to a small shop in a quaint village to get a map showing how to walk up a mountain. It's called Ordnance Survey. If that sounds like Artillery Research to you, that's because the project started because the king wanted to know how to accurately bomb Scotland.

(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Last I heard we're still in contact with Voyager 1

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

So amazing, the amount of incredible science we've been able to do with the Voyager program.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Voyager 1 is the antithesis of planned obsolescence¹, with it long outlasting its mission

¹the real kind, no the meme kind liberals often say that things are the result of

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

The sheer amount of information, feeling and emotion that happens to be conveyable by pressure waves in air. Can you imagine if sound just didn't work? How much that would suck? It's amazing that it's like.. a thing.

Sight too (obviously, now that we're thinking this way). But just how fucking weird can a thing be if you manage to think about it abstractly for a minute? Matter, over there, just so happens to excite a completely unrelated field that randomly permeates everywhere, even empty space(?!). And we went and fucking evolved little squishy organs that connect these intangible excitations in this weird field into the glob of electrical neurons that make our being. And by some complete fucking voodoo I'm sat here with a picture in my mind of all matter around me that's emitting EM radiation in the 400 to 790 trillion wobbles per second range. That's weeiird.

[–] manicdave@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet on top of that, humans have worked out a way to send that information everywhere in a fraction of a second.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lightning trapped in sand etc. I used to play a kids game called Turing Tumble which shows how all logic operations can be replicated with little plastic seesaws and marbles. If you put the bits of plastic on the board in the right way you can see marbles falling by gravity performing binary addition. It blows my mind that that's all that's going on in my PC, just a trillion times the scale. I've worked in IT all my life and it continually surprises me that any of this stuff even works.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Alternatively, if sound worked in a vacuum, the way light does, The Sun would be the loudest thing in the solar system.

I'm pretty sure in that case the sound alone would kill us..

[–] Tower@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And because everyone's glob of neurons is independent from each other, we have no way of conclusively determining if everyone's glob interprets things the same way.

Really makes me wonder what cybernetics will look like in a hundred, a thousand(!) years. No-one can experience someone else's consciousness. But if an artificial brain extension generated consciousness the same way we do and if it could be swapped between people safely. It might be the first time we have something saying, objectively, it has experienced being both of us in each of our brains and we see "red" the same way. The mind boggles...

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Homelessness. But I don't occasionally think about it. I see it every day. In the richest nation in recorded history.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That milk forms such a big part of western diets considering where it comes from.

[–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah dude the more I think of milk as sexual assault the stranger it feels.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the staff fridge at work someone used to label their milk as "breast milk" and people would go eeeww. Like it was snot or something. But from a cow's breasts? Fine! So weird.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Well humans do be gross

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

it's the lactose tolerance pyramid scheme

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Airplanes. Like I get that we can make them stay up, but we can steer them?? Across entire continents and oceans? What the entire fuck

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They are made of steel, lmao... how silly do they think we are.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Even weirder is that the most efficient way to steer them is not in straight lines. Because the most efficient way to traverse a sphere is on a slight curve.

Get a string and pick two points along the equator on a globe. Stretch the string tight. It’ll bend into a slight curve above or below the equator (instead of following the equator directly) as you pull it, because the shortest distance between two points on a globe is not a straight line.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

of course the shortest distance is a straight line, that's literally the definition of a straight line.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The point is that you can’t follow a straight line on a globe, because that’s longer than taking a slight curve. If you take a straight line, you follow the entire circumference of the earth, but following a curved path allows you to avoid some of the width. Basically, the circumference means a straight line is more curved than a curved path.

[–] asret@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Isn't it still a straight line from the perspective of someone travelling it? It just appears curved because you're looking at it from outside the curved surface.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Has anyone ever sent you nudes cause of your name?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The vastness of time and space.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Gravity and breathing

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›