this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
80 points (97.6% liked)

Politics

516 readers
408 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In apparent defiance of court orders, the Trump administration is refusing to release congressionally authorized spending for electric vehicle infrastructure, Politico reported.

On Thursday, the Trump administration halted $5 billion in funding allocated via the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program, appearing to violate the 1974 Impoundment Control Act as well as multiple court orders requiring the Trump administration to halt its unilateral funding freeze.

According to a letter from a Federal Highway Administration official, Emily Biondi, the administration is halting “new obligations” under the electric vehicle infrastructure program while allowing states to receive reimbursements for “existing obligations.”

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Under the Constitution, it is Congress, not the president, that authorizes spending decisions."

Do we really think this congress would be any different?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

~~I don't understand what you're saying. Could you clarify?~~

Edit: I get it now, you're saying that Congress would spend the same. My bad.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 24 points 4 days ago

The guy they constantly let be above the law is ignoring the law? Shock.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 4 days ago

How many masks does this guy have? The layers must be caked on at this point. Is that why it’s orange?

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 8 points 4 days ago

Guess he was right: America is a failed state.

[–] Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Coming to a highway near you: Tesla superchargers every mile.