this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
1281 points (96.2% liked)

You Should Know

34037 readers
1871 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] other_cat@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadly and unsurprisingly, nothing near me. On the bright side, we do have a farmer's market so I'll just continue to patron that and say that if you have one near you, definitely check them out!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

UK here but in my experience farmers markets cost vastly more. Shame because if a farmer just asked for cash and I can fill a sack of potatoes myself for less cost than a supermarket I would go for it. I don't need a fancy hipster shop front.

[–] chaosppe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Problem with farmers market is it costs farmers to have the stall there (rent the space), to move all their produce and they even need to man it. Which is bassically what a supermarket does, but in bulk so it's cheaper. In theory you would have to go directly to the farms for a discount.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Farm shops, so literally on the farm. Are also very expensive! The ones I see are usually targeting the middle class market so I don't really go there. I would go to a barn if it was cheaper than a supermarket

[–] chaosppe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Honestly a shame with those farmers. Unfortunately why I had to include "in theory"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would really like an Imperfect Foods replacement. Originally, IF was scratch and dent ugly veggies on discount with some consignment items. Post covid, prices crept up and then you had to pick and choose to get a deal, but you could still get a good box for under $40 every 2 wks that also included things like farro and yogurt. Misfit Marketplace bought them out and it took on a Whole Foods by mail vibe. Double to triple the regular grocery store prices. It would be $80+/week for the same box content which is galling. And it’s not the groceries, it’s MM. Who is paying $3 for 1 cucumber? $4 for 2 apples? $8 for a single pound of grapes or a pint of blueberries?

New potential produce sources are most welcome.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dr_Nik@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

So every "farm" in my region is actually a community plot you can rent space in or a non profit outreach...no farms to purchase from.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

Will it? What will eventually happen if this gains any sort of popularity is that those people you think it will piss off will simply set up their own "grass roots" alternative the directly competes with them by gaslighting them about their "horrible practices they don't want you to know", along with funding "white farmers against bullshit affirmative action racist against whites" types of movements as the cherry on top.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Well, only 2 within reasonable distance. One only sells microgreen kits. The other appears to be a supplier for restaurants, etc.

I zipped them an email to ask about private sales. But, definitely nothing on their website about sales and shipping to the public.

[–] remer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (16 children)

How is this not racist? If there were a service where you could choose to buy directly from white farmers peoples would lose their minds

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because, on average, black people are more economically disadvantaged than white people.

Choosing to explicitly buy from black farmers will, on average, tend to support those with the least financial means out of the general population of farmers, whereas choosing to explicitly buy from white farmers will, on average, tend to support those who are already more financially advantaged.

One side is directly choosing to help those most likely to be economically disadvantaged, the other would be explicitly ignoring those with the least means in order to help those who already have the most, thus the situations are not quite comparable.

I personally would prefer an index that directly assessed farmers based on overall wealth to determine who you should buy from, but because that's extraordinarily difficult to constantly update & maintain, verify, etc, it can just be easier to divide among racial lines since that still tends to produce a grouping that is relatively similar.

[–] remer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If the concern is economic disadvantages, shouldn’t the selectivity be based on income and net worth instead of skin color? Maybe selling products from poor and independent farmers. A portion of every race is economically disadvantaged.

Edit: I really appreciate your response. I think you described the issue really well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Region 5; Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin. Why are Ohio and Wisconsin grouped with the same link?

https://blackfarmersindex.com/region-5-wisconsin-%2B-ohio

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I imagine for the same reason Iowa and Nebraska are on the same page. https://blackfarmersindex.com/reg-7-iowa-and-nebraska

Wisconsin and Nebraska have such a small list that they'd be a waste of a page, I guess.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I kind of figured that was the reason, but seems like such a weak reason.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

Thank you! I did not know that. Last news that I heard about black farmers was about then getting screwed by massive ag conglomerates.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks so much for this! I don't mind scrolling and clicking either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›