this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
109 points (97.4% liked)

Science

3530 readers
163 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It's fine. Don't forget, pharmaceuticals sit on like 40 years of unpublished medical advancements because releasing them is "unprofitable".

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I really think that a federated system for scientific publication could sense. Each "journal" is a separate instance, federated with all others. A department, a school, a research institute, whatever could host it. You manage submission, editing, peer review, etc. through the system.

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do you mean exactly by federated in this context?

What is getting federated in your ideal scenario?

[–] Highstronaught@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think what they mean is every journal behaves like an instance on lemmy, federated with eachother. One journal not living up to your standards, block them on your instance etc. Like lemmy

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What does "instance" in this case refer to?

Does he mean something along the lines of advanced search filter/engine? because it can be done now, using the usual tools.

There is no way that I could think about his comment and make sense of it.

[–] Highstronaught@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Each journal hosts its own papers, but can also provide access to every other paper from journals they work with.

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

So, Lemmy is comprised of several instances of itself that can all be accessed by each other so long as they are “federated” with one another. This is designed to keep the power to censor or push an agenda out of the hands of any one person (like what’s going on with Reddit, twitter/x, and meta).

Lots of people on here see a similar set up as a panacea for the problems in all kinds of information distribution. That’s why the person you’ve been talking to is proposing the idea for scientific publishing.

I don’t think it would solve any issues of veracity. The current system allows for various publications to be seen as more or less accurate/ rigorous.

The real problem with academic publishing is the expense and IP laws that are an issue for other fields as well.

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 0 points 1 week ago

You can already follow the journals you want via RSS.

[–] plantteacher@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Might want to crosspost to !scicomm@mander.xyz, just to inject some life into that community.