Doesn't this open up a clear pathway way to discrimination?
Even AI and data has bias, add that with malicious intent, and what stops a grocer from charging exploited communities higher prices?
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
281 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
75410 readers
1645 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Look at who's coming into power tomorrow, and who's sucking him off the most. This shit is about to get ten times worse.
Companies like Amazon been doing this for a long time. Yes, it's discriminatory. No one has done anything about it. And they probably won't for at least another 4 years.
4 years
If we're lucky. And even if we have another president and that president is a Democrat and even if that president has a Democrat super majority in the House and Senate, I am not convinced that they will prioritize breaking up monopolies.
Correct, DNC is there to ensure that Democrats never do anything too much to hurt the owner class.
100%
They only take action to punch down any potential actual left-leaning candidates, ensuring no progressive representation ever gathers power stations.
Well, they certainly didn't for the last 20 years. They tried in the last 4 but were ultimately too inefficient and time ran out. But they definitely won't in the next 4.
Why 4 years? Edit: oh... Oh no.
Buckle up, buckaroos!
Yes but its a computer and computers can't have biases! /s
And even if it did, you can't arrest a computer!
They don't care if you got black or white skin. They want to syphon your money.
If only they made data harvesting illegal 20 years ago
Even today I see many bemoaning the GDPR's "onerous" obligations. Data just isn't seen like the nuclear waste it is, sadly.
walmart rolled this out and call it "dynamic pricing" I have known for half a decade that a VPN can yield me discounts and you get different prices by region for the same product, like an ISP. For the most part it seems simply being unknown provides the desired outcome. I don't think any part of dynamic or surveillance pricing is designed to ever bring a price down over learning about someone.
Including consumer related data.
This feels to me like "we know this user will typically spend the asking price rather than wait for a discount, so they will always get full price offers" or "according to cookies and other data this user also browses high end products elsewhere so we will offer inflated prices or higher 'shipping' costs and they will never question it"
I was thinking about the airport monitor that shows only your flight info because it can detect you and id you. And how many stores now have digital price tags on the shelves they can change remotely. Combine the 2 and you can have custom pricing per individual irl. 2 people standing next to each other in walmart be looking at the same thing and seeing different prices on the same display.
Yeah i see. I have heard a similar angle of the same tactic for 'smart trolleys' where your shopping trolley/cart has a tablet device you scan your customer ID with and then scan items as you shop directly into your cart and when you leave you simply pick your bags out of the trolley and walk out with automatic debiting.
However who is to say what price you see on your screen vs the guy shopping next to you like you just said, tech will really be used for the worst purposes unless regulations are in place.
Why don't Americans put pressure on legislation like Europeans did with the GDPR?
Because they work three jobs to get food on their table and have to remortgage their house to pay for an ambulance. Privacy is a first-world problem and the US is a third-world country.
Americans in aggregate simply don’t care. They don’t understand this, won’t take the time to understand it, and don’t care enough to understand.
Americans care but they're bad at organizing. Significantly so. They fight amongst themselves and get caught up in drama. They spread misinformation and don't like facts that conflict with what they believe is right. So these kinds of movements stagnate unless someone with a specific type of charisma gives them a direction to follow.
The sheep needs a good daddy shepherd, the issue we haven't had a good daddy and the last we had, got killed by the ruling class.
So we haven't had a pedon friendly daddy since then. He won't ever happen again IMHO
Only viable option is decentralized direct action and hope others act in the same to create pressure on the money changers
We would if it would make a difference.
For the same reason the EU is doing anything at all: those companies are american.
You can bet your ass if those were europeans you would see the opposite happening. See: tiktok.
I don't think so. The reverse is even happening as there are way more restrictions inside Europe for Europeans companies. The result is that they are less competitive, but more respectful for EU citizens (but unfortunately, outside companies don't always have to respect this, for now).
That's the obvious political side effect of the european stance in this, I still think there's no magical difference between the US and Europe and the more blatant evident differentiator is that they are not tanking their own economies by regulating Meta's data gathering.
You can also spin the other way around: America doesn't do the obvious right thing because of the pressure the corporations can put on the legislators.
I agree 🙂 There's also a lot of lobbying inside EU, but there's more citizens resistance (for now...). As we say about capitalism: privatize profits, share losses.
It is the same thing with that landlord software that colludes rent prices instead of competes rent prices.
The free market competition has been replaced.
Ah yes we can't have a command economy because it is too complex, but we can build a marketing dossier on every single human being.
"Why pay for more Internet than you need to? Introducing MyPlan! Internet bills are getting out of control these days! And with tariff pricing looming in the near future, we understand how many folks need to curb their spending a bit to make ends meet. MyPlan only charges you for the Internet you use--and not for all that extra bandwidth you're wasting month after month. Call one of our service representatives today!"
A plan like this would actually work if it were capped at the same price as an unlimited plan.
It never is though. Once I was lucky enough to exploit 1TB from a $70/month 5GB plan back in the days that my ISP didn't offer anything competitive. I ran that hustle for years.
Sadly, I think the flat rate (which is inevitable) would be way more than what we want to pay. Then paying for the internet we use... So frickin expensive 😔 Great idea otherwise. It'd be awesome. We never use what we're paying for... But it's the minimum.
Still ain't buying their shit. I grow veggies and buy from Chinese market.
How are you accessing the fediverse?
From affordable municipal internet that’s treated like a utility in my jurisdiction.
Just kidding, sometimes I say the craziest things.
That's good direct action but let's not pretend like it does more than it really does.
But yeah solid action IMHO