this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
901 points (96.6% liked)

memes

11284 readers
4214 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I believe in Fediverse Supremacy!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We already have American censorship on the top ones, which will get worse once Project 2025 is enacted...

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like there's suddenly a lot of shills for other platforms here.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There are no bots on Lemmy, bleep bloop.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago
[–] CurlyChopz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I honestly don't think the fediverse will ever take off - and that's a good thing. If it was to get too mainstream, eventually it would need to be standardised and controllerd to accommodate the average person, which would defeat the point of the fediverse as a whole. Imagine if everyone started using Linux as their daily driver tomorrow; a lot would be fixed, but a lot of the original identity would be broken

load more comments (1 replies)

For the average consumer it just isn't the same without being screwed by big companies.

[–] Sundiata@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Imagine the hacker news userbase getting drowned out by redditors and bots on a massive scale never seen before. Anybody coming back to the site will scoff at the idea of yet another board wasted by enshitification.

impractical, yes. But the point still stands.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›