275
submitted 2 weeks ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

lol, replace Valve with Apple and Steam with App Store and everyone would have a very different tone on here despite the fact that they both charge 30%.

[-] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

This will always be funny to me. In no other aspect of my life do I even know the charge of distributors or shops is, and I dont give a fuck. I still don't know why I as a consumer should give a fuck because that aint my problem.

I go where the best service and the best options for me are. In terms of digital games stores, Steam is easily that platform. In terms of phone platforms, for me it is easily not apple, I coule not care how much people charge to sell in their stores.

I do care about dumb monopolistic limitations though, things like apple forcing browsers to use webkit. That would be like steam forcing all games to use the source engine. Apple not allowing people to install their own store fronts, Google making that more difficult, Steam not allowing you to install Epic... oh wait.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago

one of those cares about its customers, another doesnt. But which is which?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

it's almost like these 2 companies have wildly different practices regarding how they treat their customers and business partners.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] commander@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Didn't the Epic lawsuits against Apple and Google end up showing Valves Steam cut ended up working out to something closer to 20% after all the key sales and whatever other factors. Plus EGS already does less than 20% cut and it's been like 6+ years and that client is still bare bones and they don't even do gift cards or price lower. Same for Microsofts store which I believe is lower on PC while still 30% on console.

Regardless at best this lawsuit would just mean an end to 3rd party steam key sales or Valve taking a 30% cut on those too. At best a victory against Valve would mean more expensive games with the loss of keysite stores pricing advantage

Also games used to MSRP $10 cheaper on Steam when there was an argument that going digital was a major cost savings compared to physical products/packaging, shipping, and retailler cut. Eventually publishers stopped caring and made physical and digital prices the same while adding an assortment of DLC and subscriptions

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
275 points (91.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8762 readers
586 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS