66
submitted 1 year ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/skeptic@lemmy.world
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ConTheLibrarian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Honestly that would explain the similarities between religious superstitions and the things people have admitted to believing as a child on ask Reddit.

[-] kabe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the takeaway, in my opinion :

Previous research has supported the idea that children like to replicate irrelevant actions, especially when the goal of the action becomes increasingly obscure. A 2018 study by Nielsen and colleagues showed that, when children 3-6 years old watch an adult perform unnecessary actions while opening a box, the children are more likely to repeat these behaviors when there is no clear goal to the behavior (i.e., the box is empty) than when there is (i.e., the adult retrieves a sticker from the box). This finding is in line with the precautionary approach aforementioned, as it shows that the more uncertain we are about why an action was performed, the more likely we are to repeat it, just to be safe.

All cultures share traditions of ritualistic practices that, in one way or another, relate to things that were for thousands of years beyond humanity's understanding or control - fertility, the weather, the harvest, etc.

Early communities found that doing Thing X seemed to bring about a favorable outcome so they kept doing it even though they had no idea how or why their actions had an effect.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

the more uncertain we are about why an action was performed, the more likely we are to repeat it, just to be safe.

Flashbacks to starting to code.

[-] jerrimu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Magic is in our DNA, humans have a natural affinity for mystery and awe.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
66 points (93.4% liked)

Skeptic

1282 readers
1 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS