36
submitted 11 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Sir Keir Starmer has promised to seek a major rewrite of Britain’s Brexit deal in 2025 if Labour win the next general election, saying he owes it to his children to rebuild relations with the EU.

Starmer told the Financial Times that he would put a closer trading relationship with Brussels and a new partnership with business at the heart of his efforts to bolster Britain’s economic growth.

Britain’s Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the EU, negotiated by former premier Boris Johnson, is due for review in 2025 and Starmer said he saw this as an “important” moment to reset relations.

“Almost everyone recognises the deal Johnson struck is not a good deal — it’s far too thin,” he said in an interview. “As we go into 2025 we will attempt to get a much better deal for the UK.”

...

It is far from clear whether the EU would wish to renegotiate the trade deal, which only came into force in 2021, particularly if it involved Britain selectively choosing only parts of the single market. Many in Brussels see the 2025 review as simply a tidying-up exercise. 

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] input@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

We had a deal? I'm pretty sure it was just yolo'd

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Nah, it was oven ready /s

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Jesus fucking Christ, years on and they're still mumbling 'a better deal' instead of admitting it was total failure. No details. No broad goals. Just... better! Somehow. And that's good enough for right-wing types, because they don't really mean things when they make the mouth noises. Their guy says better, it must be so! Your guy says better, well, so what.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago

Education is a means to an end. The main point being you cannot just reverse Brexit. There are still plenty of idiots who believe it should stay. The only way to reverse this is to show people what they are getting for their money. Brexit will not be here in 10 years time.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There is no fucking chance the EU would let the UK back in within 10 years. They are sick and tired of the UK's 'negotiating'

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago
[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

Some random gaslighter on the internet, lol.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

He's not in office so he doesn't speak for the EU lol

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

He has until very recently held the opinions of the whole of the EU. He is a highly credible source for what the EU thought process and what it wants. The whole agenda of the EU is to unite Europe by trade with a view to preventing future conflicts. Who in the EU has stated that the UK could not rejoin?

There will be hurdles to jump in the path back into the EU. There will be concessions made on both sides. I could easily see Greece holding out for the Elgin marbles and succeeding. Spain will attempt and fail to reintegrate Gibraltar. The EU will also have changed a lot by the time we rejoin. No one in the EU will have the same conditions that they have had in the past.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

There is no rejoin process. The application would have to be started afresh, current wait times are in excess of a decade, so I stand by statement that there is no way the UK will join the EU within 10 years.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 0 points 11 months ago

Again the opinion of some random on the internet.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

It's a fact, not an opinion. You are voicing your opinion that the UK could rejoin because some retired failed French president wannabe says so.

Please paste a link to the EU rejoining process

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

It’s a fact, not an opinion.

Based on what? You keep spouting gibberish but never with anything to back it up.

Labour are already in negotiations to dampen the effects of Brexit. Closer alignment is admitting that we have to align and trade with the EU for a better economy.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Sigh

Facts:

  1. There is no rejoin process

  2. The joining process takes on average a decade

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlargement_of_the_European_Union

Versus your quoted ramblings of an old man in the Torygraph

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

A simple google will confirm Barnier's comments. First you say they are invalid because of the speaker, now you criticise the source when the speaker is highlighted as being extremely credible. A very poor attempt imo.

From your own link:

According to the EU treaties, membership of the European Union is open to "any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them" (TEU Article 49). Those Article 2 values are "respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities." This is based on the 1993

The reason some Eastern block countries take so long is because they have to change their own infrastructure. The UK does not have to do this. You are not comparing apples to apples.

Membership requires that candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights, respect for and protection of minorities, the existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union. Membership presupposes the candidate's ability to take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.

The UK currently fails under this criteria. Starmer has made pledges to reverse all this crap within 100 days.

Before a country applies for membership it typically signs an association agreement to help prepare the country for candidacy and eventual membership. Most countries do not meet the criteria to even begin negotiations before they apply, so they need many years to prepare for the process. An association agreement helps prepare for this first step.

Does not apply to the UK once these scumbags are gone. Provided Starmer makes good on his commitments. We also have to renegotiate the TCA in 2025. One thing is certain is that the UK will align closer to the EU. This will facilitate any future requests to rejoin not hinder them. The days of divergence will die with the Tories.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Sure, the EU will let the UK jump to the front of the queue.

I thought you might have a better grasp of politics than that

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

I thought you might have a better grasp of politics than that

Whilst having nothing to contradict what I am stating. Having an inane belief in an opinion does not make it true.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Having an inane belief in an opinion does not make it true.

Finally you get it!

:D

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The TCA has a 5 year review process so there's opportunity to improve on the very thin deal that was agreed at pace and with idiots in Downing Street

The EU also offered reduced checks for food safety alignment, and musicians visas.

There are plenty of areas to work on, especially now Labour has a leader who isn't anti EU as well.

[-] tillimarleen@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

Still on the hunt for the perfect Brexit

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

I don't think the EU wants y'all back fella...

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago

Sure we've had Brexit, but what about second Brexit?

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

I don't think they know about second Brexit Pip.

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

You're kidding. It'd be an astonishing political victory.

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

The EU wants the UK back. We're stronger together and the UK can bring much to the table if it's not currently going bonkers.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, about that whole "not going bonkers" thing ...

[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

Not to rejoin, no (and who can blame them?). But that's not his plan!

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

TBH the UK in the single market is a better outcome for the UK as well as the EU. It puts something like reins on our frequently out-of-control government and leaves one powerful neoliberal voice out of the shouting match.

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago

Would these mean we're 'reheating' Bojo's 'oven-ready deal'.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

That would imply that it really was over-ready as opposed to uncooked random ingredients still sitting in fields in farms, probably in the EU.

[-] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I voted Leave. This is fine.

Successive governments chopping and changing our relationship with the EU is what I expect. Brexit is a process, not an event.

[-] Treczoks@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

What on earth could the UK offer to the EU to even think of opening a re-negotiation phase? And if you believe that the UK can somehow "out-deal" the UK during that, remember that the negotiation skills are still with the EU.

But you said you voted for desaster. You got it, be happy.

[-] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I mean, they literally renegotiated the Northern Ireland Protocol earlier this year. Or the "Windsor Framework" as it's known.

The whole point of negotiations is to create a situation that's beneficial to both parties. It's in both the UK's and the EU's interest.

[-] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Pretty weird seeing British tourists disappear over the past few years. Used to run into them all the time.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

UK Politics

2967 readers
171 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS