I wonder if it would take more or less time with auto-complete.

Fuuuuck there goes my plan to get this monkey to write Hamlet within the lifetime of the universe...

Their assumptions must be wrong. They do not account for the most basic principle of the universe, "the show must go on."

Are spelling and punctuation expected to be accurate?

I just listened to a podcast about assembly theory and I think that it kind of relates here too, though maybe not. If we start randomly generating text that is the lenght of the Hamlet, then Hamlet itself would be one of the possible, finite number of possibilities that could be generated within these parameters. Interesting theory nevertheless.

If we think about a screwdriver, the theory would argue that it couldn’t simply appear out of nowhere because its structure is too specific and complex to have come into existence by chance alone. For that screwdriver to exist, a multitude of precise processes are required: extracting raw materials, refining them, shaping metal, designing the handle, etc. The probability of all these steps happening in the right order, spontaneously, is essentially zero. Assembly theory would say that each stage in the creation of a screwdriver represents a selection event, where choices are made, materials are transformed, and functions are refined.

What makes assembly theory especially intriguing is that it offers a framework to distinguish between things that could arise naturally, like a rock or even an organic molecule, and things that bear the hallmarks of a directed process. To put it simply, a screwdriver couldn't exist without a long sequence of assembly steps that are improbable to arise by chance, thereby making its existence a hallmark of intentional design or, at the very least, a directed process.

Alright then. 2 monkeys... 3? 4? The answer has to be a number lol.

This must be a very important question to whoever keeps funding these studies.

They are, however, exceptionally adept at political speechwriting.